Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BHI) has $15 billion burning a hole in its pocket to invest in the energy industry and there is $100 billion of other investors’ money “waiting on the sidelines” to see if Congress passes a broad energy bill this year that repeals the Public Utility Holding Company Act (PUHCA), MidAmerican Energy’s David Sokol told a natural gas strategy conference in Denver last week.

PUHCA, a fossilized law passed in 1935 that restricts investments by holding companies owning natural gas or electric utilities, has progressed “from nuisance to menace,” said the Chairman of MidAmerican Energy Holdings, a subsidiary of the Warren Buffett-led BHI. He called on Congress to move quickly to repeal PUHCA to open the field to non-traditional investors to “re-capitalize the industry.”

Both the House and Senate versions of the energy bill, which are headed to conference committee, would wipe PUHCA from the books. But Senate Democrats fear this could prompt a wave of acquisitions, putting the energy industry in the hands of a few large companies. They want stronger consumer protections to be enacted in place of PUHCA, which Republicans oppose.

Capital from BHI, funneled through MidAmerican, already has helped complete the 900 MMcf/d Wyoming-to-California Kern River Pipeline expansion, and another 500 MMcf/d expansion of that pipeline is in the works, Sokol pointed out. MidAmerican bought Kern River from financially-strapped Williams in April 2002 and provided the funding to complete the major expansion this spring.

Buffett’s BHI ventured into the energy industry in the late 1990s with its purchase of MidAmerican Energy for $2 billion. It since has snatched up Northern Natural Gas pipeline in addition to Kern River, and made major loans to cash-poor energy companies.

“The entire industry should support this legislation,” Sokol told attendees at the Colorado Oil and Gas Association’s natural gas conference, advising those with reservations “not to let the perfect be the enemy of the good.” Repeal of PUHCA would encourage a host of non-traditional companies to invest in the ailing energy industry.

Kern River will proceed with an open season later this year with a target in-service date of late 2005 to early 2006 to test the market support for a second expansion. But that support has to come from creditworthy customers, Sokol said, noting that four Kern River shippers had gone into bankruptcy in the last year. He also pointed out that other pipelines are re-examining planned projects, particularly those that would fuel new power plants in what he called “a deteriorating market.”

In a briefing with reporters last week in Washington, DC, Donald F. Santa Jr., the new president of the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA), agreed that PUHCA repeal would be “beneficial” for pipelines and the energy industry as a whole.

While the Senate’s action surrounding energy legislation last month “[was] somewhat surprising and in some cases downright bizarre,” he noted that it got the bill passed and on its way to conference before the August recess, which he said was critical.

The Republican-led Senate realized that its “window of opportunity was closing” to pass an energy bill this session, Santa said. It has nine appropriations bills waiting when it returns in early September, which would have left the Senate with little time to debate energy legislation. The Senate recognized there was a possibility the bill could spill over into 2004, an election year, when energy issues would be “even more politically charged and more partisan,” he noted.

The demand for floor time on Senate legislation is going to be “pretty intense” in the fall, given the appropriations bills and other legislation, said Bill Wicker, spokesman for the Democratic members of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Debate on an energy bill would have been significantly restricted as a result, he noted.

Wicker said he was “confident” that the conference committee, which is expected to be chaired by Senate Energy Committee Chairman Pete Domenici (R-NM), will vote out a conference report on the energy bill in “relatively short order.” He doubts there will be a repeat of last year, when the bill fell apart in conference over disputes about electricity and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR).

But Capitol Hill aides aren’t so sure an energy bill will clear Congress and be sent to President Bush before the end of the year. One aide put the odds at about 50-50. Getting a comprehensive energy bill passed on Capitol Hill is especially difficult because energy “is not a Democratic [or] Republican thing,” but rather “it’s mostly a regional issue,” said one source. In fact, “on almost every [energy] issue, you can see where it breaks down along geographical lines.”

Whether energy legislation clears both houses this session is “entirely driven by what the [conference] report says,” Wicker noted. If it’s “fair and balanced,” then it has got an “excellent chance of passing,” he told NGI.

While neither the Senate nor the House can amend the conference report on the floor, either body can vote it down or the Senate can hold up the legislation by filibustering it.

What issues could trigger a filibuster? “Obviously one is ANWR. That’s a guaranteed filibuster. That’s like a poison pill,” Wicker said. He doubts that Domenici’s substitute electricity title, which calls for PUHCA repeal, will be a deal-breaker for Senate Democrats, but he noted it may pose problems for House conferees.

Domenici signaled last week that he plans to reshape in conference the Senate energy measure, which was crafted by the Democrats when they were in charge of the Senate, to mirror the Republican bill that was derailed in late July. “You can change a significant amount” of the bill in conference, conceded Wicker, but he said there is a “scope of conference” that imposes certain parameters and limitations on the issues to be discussed.

This means House and Senate conferees will pretty much have to stick to issues that are in one or both energy bills, he noted. “There could be some new things brought up, but they would have to closely resemble things that are in the bill already.”

Senate and House leaders are expected to pick conferees for the energy measure shortly after lawmakers return in early September. The Senate is likely to name 13 conferees (seven Republicans and six Democrats). The House will have far more conferees, but the number was not immediately known. Last year, the House had about 60 conferees on the energy bill.

©Copyright 2003 Intelligence Press Inc. Allrights reserved. The preceding news report may not be republishedor redistributed, in whole or in part, in any form, without priorwritten consent of Intelligence Press, Inc.