Mindful of declining production in its traditional Gulf of Mexico area supply base, Atlanta, GA-based AGL Resources is focusing increasingly on the potential for LNG, including increased supplies from the two established LNG import terminals on the southeastern Atlantic Coast and possibilities for another import terminal in an industrial area near Norfolk and Virginia Beach, VA, AGL Chairman Paula Rosput said Wednesday.

AGL is “looking at several proposals,” for LNG facilities north of Virginia Beach on the York River feeding into the Chesapeake Bay, with the company’s main focus being on pipeline takeaway capacity, Rosput told reporters in a Washington DC briefing. The company has a 180-mile, high pressure joint-use pipeline that could carry gas from the area to connections with Columbia Gas, Dominion and Transco. AGL is talking to producers about the possibility of a new LNG import terminal and also to Dominion, which has proposed barging LNG from Cove Point, MD, on the eastern side of the Chesapeake to storage tanks at points along the East Coast via specially designed barges (see Daily GPI, June 14).

With the Elba Island, GA LNG terminal, again the problem is “there is not adequate pipeline capacity to takeaway the totality of the storage capacity on winter days,” the AGL chairman said. The terminal originally was built to protect local markets, but now is being expanded as a wholesale facility. AGL is proposing to buy some pipeline assets from El Paso’s Southern Natural Gas pipeline south of Atlanta and “I can see us working in a cooperative way with Southern” to de-bottleneck transportation from the Elba Island plant. That plant is currently being expanded and could eventually be expanded again, Rosput said.

It’s all about having a “configuration that assures that we have straws in several directions. If you’re 100% reliant on the Gulf Coast, it’s a very troublesome specter to think about affordable, available energy when you’re pulling from a depleting area.” AGL is not looking to monopolize the market, but “the fact is marketers don’t make long term commitments to gas supply. So as a practical matter you have to determine what’s the best configuration of pipeline that’s going to assure you the best mix of long-term access in an environment where nobody contracts for the supply.”

AGL, through its Atlanta Gas Light Co., serves 1.5 million gas distribution customers throughout Georgia and additional customers through its Virginia Natural Gas subsidiary in southeastern Virginia and Chattanooga Gas Co. in Tennessee. It’s the southern location, the fact that between 80% and 90% of its gas is consumed on peak days and those days number about 20, that complicates the supply situation. Locking up a lot of long-line capacity for 365 days a year doesn’t make sense, and for this reason, LNG does. The company is the largest operator of small market area LNG facilities, where the gas is piped in, gasified and stored for peak use. AGL also has several propane air booster plants and is constructing another.

The company also sees possibilities in Appalachia. “Today there’s not that much production and it doesn’t go that far; but at these prices, given the consolidation in the Appalachian Basin, could we see more reliable production being exported farther?” Rosput offered.

Since Georgia is the only state that has been through total unbundling and come out the other side, Rosput was asked about the ultimate result for consumers. The state currently is served by 10 marketers of which four (including an AGL affiliate) are dominant. Georgia consumers are not seeing much difference in natural gas prices compared to those in surrounding areas, the AGL chairman said. But they do get a variety of service options, and “companies don’t have the problem of regulators trying to retrospectively look at whether somebody hedged properly or not; it’s a business risk. There also is more efficiency around the buying and dispatching of gas; it’s a very stable system today” with four large creditworthy marketers.

Rosput also said the provider of last resort system, which the state participates in funding, provides a very orderly process for low income customers who can’t pay their bills. Conversely, marketers are quick to cut off those who could, but don’t, pay. In the past those overdue bills would just have been rolled into the utility’s bad debt category and the cost spread to others on the system.

©Copyright 2004 Intelligence Press Inc. All rights reserved. The preceding news report may not be republished or redistributed, in whole or in part, in any form, without prior written consent of Intelligence Press, Inc.