Royal Dutch/Shell Group shareholders easily approved all of the resolutions on the group’s ballot on Monday, but the voting indicated some dissatisfaction with current management.

The Dutch group held its meeting in The Hague, where it is headquartered, while a similar meeting was being held in London for Shell Transport & Trading Co. Royal Dutch holds 60% of the operating group, while London-based Shell holds 40%.

Even though all of the resolutions put forward by the company passed, many of the shareholders from each company voiced their displeasure in the reserves accounting scandal that has required the company to recategorize 22% of its oil and natural gas reserves since January.

However, with no resolutions specifically about the reserves problems, shareholders expressed their opinions in other ways. Investors representing nearly 40% of the Dutch stock voted against a resolution that stipulated the managing directors and the supervisory board should “be discharged of responsibility in respect of their management for the year 2003.” And 10% of the London-based company’s shareholders disapproved of the group’s executive remuneration package.

The concerns were noted by the executive team. “These recent months have felt simply dreadful,” the group’s top executive, Jeroen van der Veer, said at The Hague meeting. “I agree that such a crisis should never have happened. But it has, and I sincerely regret this.”

When the scandal broke, three top executives were fired and van der Veer was selected to take over. Among other things, Shell dropped a bonus plan that compensated executives for growing the company’s proved and probable reserves. However, the plan to include hydrocarbon reserves growth into bonus packages for executives may be reinstituted in the future.

Malcolm Brinded, managing director of London-based Shell Transport & Trading Co., told shareholders that even though the company has “taken reserves off the bonus scorecard for this year…we will look again, because reserves replacement is an essential component of our targets.” Brinded said he did not think the bonus system for reserves building “has ever been seen as a major inducement” because only 5-7% of the bonus packages were based on that criteria.

©Copyright 2004 Intelligence Press Inc. All rights reserved. The preceding news report may not be republished or redistributed, in whole or in part, in any form, without prior written consent of Intelligence Press, Inc.