A coalition of pipeline customers has accused interstate gaspipelines of attempting to bypass FERC Order 637’s limits on theuse of penalties by offering their customers new services thatinclude penalties masked in “sheep’s clothing.”

“We are disappointed by these developments and strongly urge theCommission to hew to the course it established in Order 637 forevaluating pipeline penalties, OFOs and other mechanisms thatrestrict operational flexibility,” the Pipeline TransportationCustomer Coalition, a group of key pipeline customers, wrote toChairman James J. Hoecker on Tuesday. It called for the new serviceofferings and tariff changes of pipelines to be “closelyscrutinized” by FERC.

The coalition contends some pipelines have used their Order 637compliance filings as an opportunity to “strip” firm shippers ofthe service rights now included in existing pipeline tariffstructures. They are replacing them with new, separately pricedservices that are “more restrictive,” with “new penalties(re-labeled ‘charges’ or ‘fees’ to be kept by the pipeline) andtighter tolerances,” it charged.

These “new, high-priced service offerings” of some pipelines “dolittle more than put the penalty ‘wolf’ in the ‘sheep’s clothing’of new services,” the coalition said. “The pipelines predictablystructured the new ‘services’ to send the resulting revenuesdirectly to themselves, rather than to the customers. As a result,many pipelines’ proposed tariff provisions regarding penalties andimbalance management services combine to degrade, not upgrade, thequality of services available to shippers.”

Certain pipelines have resisted the temptation to make theirtariffs “less flexible and more punitive,” the coalitionacknowledged, but it contends they “have nonetheless strayed” fromOrder 637 by making “unsubstantiated claims” that their currenttariffs comply with the new Commission standards.

In their compliance filings, “we believe that, by and large,pipelines have rebuffed the Commission” Order 637 mandate callingfor limited use of penalties by pipes. Order 637 enacted a policythat restricts the use of punitive penalty measures againstcustomers to situations where system integrity is threatened andincreased the options available to shippers to manage theirsupplies, according to the coalition.

The group said it expected a “more fluid and competitiveinterstate grid” as a result. “Unfortunately, it appears that manypipelines have managed to read Order 637 differently than we do.Rather than submitting compliance filings that benefit theirshippers, many pipelines have submitted compliance filingsproposing tariff and operational changes that inure to the solebenefit of the pipeline.”

The members of the coalition include the Independent PetroleumAssociation of America, the Natural Gas Supply Association, theDomestic Petroleum Council, the Process Gas Consumers Group, theAmerican Iron and Steel Institute, the Georgia Industrial Group,the American Forest & Paper Association, Dynegy Marketing andTrade, and the American Public Gas Association.

©Copyright 2000 Intelligence Press Inc. All rights reserved. Thepreceding news report may not be republished or redistributed, inwhole or in part, in any form, without prior written consent ofIntelligence Press, Inc.