A much smaller energy merchant sector now is operating in a “hybrid” state with ambiguous rules and could remain only a minor part of the energy industry well into the future, one industry veteran said Thursday.

“Eleven years ago when I started working in trading and risk management, we had a vision of a great future,” said Vincent Kaminski, senior vice president of commercial analytics for Reliant Resources Inc. Kaminski, speaking at Hart’s Energy Markets executive forum on “Trading and Risk: Profit and Protection” in Houston, said “We expected to have very liquid, long-term markets resembling Wall Street firms…but we know now that the great vision didn’t materialize.”

Kaminski, whose resume includes analytical research for Citadel Investment Group LLP and Enron Corp., said he now believes that “energy trading problems are here for the long term.”

The loss of 12,000 to 15,000 jobs in the energy trading sector “will not be reversed in our professional lifetime. If they fired a cannon down Smith Street today, it would not hit a single energy trader.” Houston’s Smith Street had once been the address not only of Enron but many other former energy merchants.

Unlike the “option” model used by Enron and others in the past, Kaminski noted that today, most are trading around their assets. “In my view, one should start with assets to make statements about optionality and not with an option model to make statements about assets.” The business model has to recognize physical assets, and “recognize many constraints. It’s difficult to optimize within a model.” However, asset-based companies still face a “huge risk of credit, which is not going away,” said Kaminski. And credit risk management creates “excessive needs for working capital.”

Long-term contracts also are posing dangers, he noted. “You can lock in prices that are too low or too high, which creates the potential for future defaults and semi-defaults, and there is the inability to mange long-term fuel price risk.” Kaminski also expects to see more companies attempt to cancel their contracts, which will continue to cause problems into the future.

Zimin Lu, vice president of Tractebel’s research and analysis, agreed it is a “tough time” for merchants who face many challenges ahead. However, Lu said there are “reasons for hope.” Tractebel, which is making more inroads into North America, uses an integrated business model which doesn’t rely on one part of its business to do well; rather, it uses all of them together so that the weaker businesses are strengthened by the stronger ones.

“Stand-alone energy merchants are threatened by shifts in the market,” said Lu. “We’re not in a great period as a merchant right now, but if we can capture the upside, we’ll be fine.” As in nature, he said, “only the strong will survive. The non-integrated players will struggle as they can no longer balance their business and hedge physically or financially their positions at low cost.”

However, Lu noted that “demand will continue to grow, which will absorb capacity over time, and the cycle will rebound.” Across the value chain, he added, “companies with solid credit and balanced aspirations will find opportunities.”

©Copyright 2003 Intelligence Press Inc. All rights reserved. The preceding news report may not be republished or redistributed, in whole or in part, in any form, without prior written consent of Intelligence Press, Inc.