In a stunning setback for shale development in New York state, an appellate court ruled unanimously last week to uphold two local bans on oil and gas activities. Attorneys representing landowners and energy companies told NGI that they have already started the process to appeal to the top court in the state, the Court of Appeals.
On Thursday, a four-judge panel at Appellate Division Third Department in Albany issued rulings in two cases that are under intense scrutiny by supporters and opponents of shale development: Norse Energy Corp. USA v. Town of Dryden, No. 515227; and Cooperstown Holstein Corp. v. Town of Middlefield, No. 515498. At issue was whether the towns violated the state’s Oil, Gas and Solution Mining Law (OGSML).
“We hold that the OGSML does not pre-empt, either expressly or impliedly, a municipality’s power to enact a local zoning ordinance banning all activities related to the exploration for, and the production and storage of, natural gas and petroleum within its borders,” Presiding Justice Karen Peters wrote in the opinion for the Dryden case, which was then applied to Middlefield. Justices Leslie Stein, Edward Spain and Elizabeth Garry concurred in both decisions.
“We don’t have any automatic appeal, but we can seek leave to appeal from the Court of Appeals,” Thomas West, an attorney from The West Firm PLLC, told NGI. “Two of the criteria [for an appeal] are whether it’s a novel question, and whether it’s a question of statewide significance. We think we have both.” Scott Kurkoski, an attorney with the Binghamton, NY, firm Levene Gouldin & Thompson LLP, concurred. “It falls into the category of a case that they would want to entertain. It’s an important state interest,” he said Friday, adding that they should know if the high court will hear the case in the next few months.
According to the attorneys, opening arguments in both cases could begin before the end of the year if the appeals are successful.
Court documents show the appellate court used a Court of Appeals’ ruling from a 1987 case, Frew Run Gravel Products Inc. v. Town of Carroll, to support their decisions in the Dryden and Middlefield cases. In Frew Run, the high court reversed a lower court ruling and allowed a town to enforce its zoning laws, which prohibited extractive mining operations.
“I think it’s unfortunate that the court relied as heavily as it did on Frew Run,” Kurkoski said. “This decision is going to have to be made by the Court of Appeals. It’s their Frew Run decision that all of the courts are relying on. But that was a mining case, not an oil and gas case. The language is different and the interests are clearly different. We have a greater interest in producing energy than producing sand and gravel.”
West is representing Norse Energy Corp. ASA in the Dryden case, while Kurkoski is representing dairy company Cooperstown Holstein Corp. (CHC) and its owner, Jennifer Huntington, in the Middlefield case. Both said they were surprised by Thursday’s rulings. “It’s surprising, but it’s still a question of law,” West said. “If we can get it to the Court of Appeals, we still remain confident in our position and we think the Court of Appeals is the right court to answer this question.”
Â©Copyright 2013Intelligence Press Inc. All rights reserved. The preceding news reportmay not be republished or redistributed, in whole or in part, in anyform, without prior written consent of Intelligence Press, Inc.
© 2022 Natural Gas Intelligence. All rights reserved.
ISSN © 2577-9877 | ISSN © 1532-1266 |