Canada’s Ambassador to the United States, Michael Kergin, urged Congress Wednesday to reject the Alaska pipeline route restrictions that were approved last week by the Energy Conference Committee as part of the energy bill (see Daily GPI, Sept. 13). Speaking at RBC Financial Group’s Distinguished Speakers Series at the Metropolitan Club in Washington, DC, the ambassador also expressed Canada’s opposition to proposed subsidies for Alaskan gas production. A vote on the subsidies and other tax-related provisions has been delayed by the committee.

“Canada provides an unfettered, free market source that flows every day without political interference or cartel economics and we want to keep it that way,” said Kergin. “However, certain legislation in Congress threatens to have government intrude into the marketplace in ways which could have a negative impact on our energy trade.”

Kergin noted that the committee approved legislation that basically restricts the gas industry to building a pipeline only along the Alaska Highway. It prohibits a northern route through the Beaufort Sea and down the Mackenzie River in Canada. The latter route is expected to be less expensive. The committee also is considering a subsidy for Alaskan gas that is expected to cost more than $1 billion/year.

“By artificially distorting price signals on which investors rely to make their capital decisions, this price subsidy proposal could well retard North American natural gas development, both in Canada and the rest of the United States,” said Kergin, noting that the Bush administration opposes the measure “because it costs too much, because it will distort markets and because, they believe, it will have an impact on the Canada-U.S. energy relationship.

“We hope Congress will ultimately conclude that it is the marketplace, not government subsidies, which will ensure Americans receive secure clean burning gas at the lowest possible price.”

Kergin noted that despite the excellent trade relationship between the two countries there are areas of disagreement, some of which have been around for more than 200 years. When disagreements arise, Canada has appealed to the World Trade Organization and the North American Free Trade Agreement. He said political agreement is much more preferable than lengthy litigation.

©Copyright 2002 Intelligence Press Inc. All rights reserved. The preceding news report may not be republished or redistributed, in whole or in part, in any form, without prior written consent of Intelligence Press, Inc.