Although FERC and California regulators have made a lot of headway in past months in their effort to relieve the imbalance between in-state and interstate pipeline capacity, Commissioner Linda Breathitt said Wednesday that she still is somewhat unsettled by FERC’s tendency to routinely approve interstate pipe projects without giving full weight to the impact on existing shippers.

“I remain uneasy about the…policies the Commission has advanced in favor of certification of interstate capacity despite the [inadequacy] of takeaway capacity and particularly the confidence with which the Commission has rejected the legitimate concerns of shippers on [Kern River’s] system,” she said during the regular FERC meeting.

Breathitt’s remarks were part of a concurring opinion on two orders in which FERC denied rehearing of its certificate approval for Kern River Gas Transmission’s 2002 Expansion Project and California Action Project [CP01-31, CP01-106-001]. Firm customers of Kern River sought reconsideration of the certificate orders on the grounds that the expansions would result in pro-rata capacity reductions for existing shippers at Wheeler Ridge and would diminish their firm delivery rights.

Despite her concerns, Breathitt noted that she was “pleased that over the past six months the Commission has come to acknowledge that our actions in certificating the Kern River expansions could exacerbate the problems of delivering natural gas to end-users in Southern California.”

Even more importantly, “the Commission has recognized the potential degradation of shippers’ firm rights resulting from the certification of additional interstate capacity is an appropriate factor in the public benefits analysis that we use to determine whether a project is in the public convenience and necessity,” she said.

Moreover, “I am relieved that certain events are occurring in California that will mitigate congestion at Wheeler Ridge. More takeaway capacity is on the horizon, and the California PUC is considering certain regulatory relief that will facilitate the transportation of natural gas from Wheeler Ridge to Southern California markets.”

Nevertheless, Breathitt urged her FERC colleagues “not [to] lose sight of the panoply of issues we must consider in issuing natural gas pipeline certificates.”

This doesn’t mean, however, that she is against all new pipelines and expansion projects, Breathitt said. “I most certainly share the sense of urgency to ensure adequate and reliable energy supplies. However, there is more to the Commission’s mandate under the Natural Gas Act than simply getting more pipe in the ground.”

Breathitt noted that the Commission plans to revisit the issue of the adequacy of California takeaway capacity when it takes up Kern River’s pending application for its proposed 2003 Expansion Project [CP01-422]. Firm customers on the pipeline have already protested the application. They claim that Kern River has sold nearly 500,000 Dth/d of additional primary firm delivery point capacity at Wheeler Ridge in the three expansion projects, and that they are experiencing scheduling cuts as a result.

When the Kern River 2003 expansion comes before the Commission, “I will continue to advocate a thoughtful and coordinated approach to fostering badly needed interstate and intrastate expansion in California.”

©Copyright 2001 Intelligence Press Inc. All rights reserved. The preceding news report may not be republished or redistributed, in whole or in part, in any form, without prior written consent of Intelligence Press, Inc.