Senate to Review Alaska Pipeline Proposals
Chairman Frank Murkowski (R-AK) said recently the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee plans to begin tackling the issue of transporting Alaska's North Slope natural gas to the Lower 48 market when Congress reconvenes in September.
He said the time is ripe for Congress to begin discussing an Alaska pipeline system based on the ever-increasing demand for natural gas by electric power generators, which he believes will keep gas prices high enough to justify the economics of construction.
At a hearing, tentatively scheduled for Sept. 14, the Senate panel will begin reviewing the economical, environmental and strategic and international aspects of some of the pending proposals for moving gas from Alaska to the Lower 48 market. "It's time for Congress to examine the proposals and determine the federal role to expedite developing the projects," Murkowski noted. Some of the pending proposals include:
- Arctic Resources Co.'s Northern Gas Pipeline Project, which would run eastward from Prudhoe Bay in Alaska and come ashore in the Mackenzie Delta area in northern Canada, then follow the Mackenzie River south through the Northwest Territories to interconnect with pipelines in Alberta with access to U.S. markets;
- A proposal to build the northern half of the Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System (ANGTS), with the gas transported from Prudhoe Bay south along the Alaska Highway, across the Yukon, northern British Columbia and Alberta. The southern portion of ANGST, from Alberta to the U.S. border, was completed long ago;
- An LNG project, where gas would be piped to Valdez, chilled into a liquid and shipped to Asian markets; and
- A gas-to-liquids project, where gas would be refined into a liquid and shipped through the oil pipeline in Alaska.
Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK) already is on record favoring the pipeline project that would follow the "Alaska Highway," saying the competing Prudhoe Bay-to-Mackenzie Delta project would deny Alaskans access to the state's huge gas reserves.
Murkowski would not say which project he favors, but it appears that he, too, is leaning towards the "Alaska Highway" proposal. Specifically, he said he would oppose any pipe construction through the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge or offshore in the Beaufort Sea that would deny Alaska towns access to the 34.4 Tcf of proven gas reserves in the North Slope.
The hearing "will give all sides a chance to clarify where things stand and allow Congress a chance to look at the policy implications of Alaska gas finally reaching markets," Murkowski said in a prepared statement. "Given the changes in the national and international supply and pricing situation since Congress last considered the Alaska gas issue in 1977-78, it is time to get this project underway."
©Copyright 2000 Intelligence Press, Inc. All rights reserved. The preceding news report may not be republished or redistributed in whole or in part without prior written consent of Intelligence Press, Inc.