CA Gov. Claims Near Deal to Buy SoCal Ed's Lines for $2.76 Billion
The hoped-for agreement among California's three investor-owned
utilities and the California's political establishment was still
out of reach last Friday, but feeling the need to announce some
progress in preparation for his political trip to Washington, DC,
and Wall Street early this week. Gov. Gray Davis said the state is
closest to a deal to pay $2.76 billion for the transmission lines
of Southern California Edison.
Davis said he hopes to have the details worked out with Edison
and Sempra Energy's San Diego Gas and Electric at the end of this
week. While saying "some progress" has been made with PG&E
Corp., Davis said he is still farthest from a deal with the San
Francisco-based utility. Negotiations are ongoing separately with
each of three major private-sector utilities to buy their
transmission assets, which roughly represent 60% of the state grid,
the part now operated by Cal-ISO, but still owned by the utilities.
"Those transmission lines represent a very important asset to
the people of this state," said the governor, noting that over the
past 15 years under regulation and deregulation, private investment
has not come forward to eliminate system bottlenecks. He implied,
but did not specify, that the state will now take care of the
needed enhancements, which some people estimate as several billion
dollars of capital improvements.
"We're going to acquire the transmission lines because doing so
will have the effect of building two new power plants totaling
1,000 MW," he said.
Citing his usual admonition that everything will be done without
rate increases, Davis briefly characterized the informal agreement
with Edison as "a complicated transaction with very cheap rates" in
which not only would the utility and its holding company sell its
transmission assets at about 2.3 times their book value, but they
also agreed to sell the state power from its utility plants and one
Edison Mission Energy merchant power plant for 10 years on a
The deal would also call for the utility parent company, Edison
International,ÿreturning $420 million to the utility to help it get
out of debt, and giving the state 99-year easement to 20,000 acres
of watershed tied to Edison's hydro-electric generation system.
On a conference call with its bondholders Friday, Edison said it
is the desire of all parties to "conclude these negotiations as
quickly as possible" and reach a formal agreement that can be
signed. Edison characterized the current agreement as a "conceptual
framework." The utility's executives said that the utility was
"active discussions and some progress is being made," but they
would not verify the governor's claim that part of the agreement
involves the utility foregoing all outstanding rate increase
applications and lawsuits, along with accepting $2.76 billion for
its transmission assets. In the past, Edison said it thought the
market value of its transmission system alone was worth $6 billion.
"This entire transaction, which I feel is fair and balanced,
will be accomplished within the present rate structure," Davis
said. "We will not be asking any more of the consumers. I have
worked very hard to find a solution that does not ask anymore of
the ratepayers. This is not their fault; they didn't ask for
"We made very substantial progress with Southern California
Edison, so that is why I made this announcement today. Within a
week, I hope to be able to tell you that we have a final deal with
Edison. We also have made good progress with Sempra. We are making
some progress with PG&E, but not to the point where I feel
comfortable representing that progress will be made."
Based on the extreme disorganization in the governor's camp,
starting the press announcement more than an hour late, and the
very careful wording in the response of PG&E Corp.'s CEO, it
appeared Friday that talks are still tenuous and a final deal
"Yesterday's discussions were an important milestone in the
resolution of California's energy crisis," said PG&E's Robert
Glynn in a press release. We look forward to continued discussions
with the Governor to resolve outstanding issues relating to
PG&E. Our meeting (Thursday) provided an important opportunity
to clarify our comprehensive proposal. Each utility's issues and
opportunities in this crisis are different, and we believe that
PG&E has proposed a detailed solution that balances ratepayer
and shareholder interests."
PG&E did add in its formal statement that it feels a
resolution is possible, although none of the utilities will verify
whether "a final deal" will require that all three are on board.
Sempra Energy, has been on record as being willing to sell its
transmission assets "if it helps solve the crisis."
Before Friday's announcement by the governor, Edison and
PG&E had been less willing to accept the state's offers. Edison
International CEO John Bryson reportedly was considering the
relative merits of taking less than what he thinks the transmission
assets are worth or submitting to bankruptcy for the utility.
PG&E so far has publicly expressed reluctance to sell at any
With creditors and unpaid suppliers waiting in line,
California's program to sign significant long-term power supply
contracts has been slow to develop. Nevertheless, Williams became
the second supplier to announce a long-term deal when it inked a
10-year pact last Thursday for modest volumes of peaking supplies.
And on Friday a one-month deal for 750 MW was announced by Mirant
Corp. (formerly Southern Energy).
"We became more confident in our ability to enter such a
contract after we received full payment from the state DWR for a
bill due Feb. 20," said Randy Harrison, CEO of Mirant's western
The Williams deal, which would start April 1, calls for at least
175 MW of peaking power, increasing to 350 MW by June 1and at least
900 MW by 2006, is the second long-term pact announced. Calpine
announced one earlier in the month, which does not kick in until
this fall, after the peak summer demand.
With the new momentum toward more signed power deals, including
Reliant Energy's agreement to provide 30 days of spot emergency
supplies and have them handled by DWR, the grid operator, Cal-ISO,
for the first time in 40 days lifted all power alerts Thursday.
Reliant made the move despite being owed more than $300 million for
power by the state's ISO and/or utilities.
Principally the availability of more than 5,000 MW of imported
power from the Pacific Northwest and a sharp drop in peak demand
allowed the state-chartered transmission operator to the lift its
last remaining Stage One alert. It saw the amounts of real-time
emergency power that it had to purchase drop to about 10% of the
state's demand, the lowest it has been in months. Generation
capacity out of service for planned or unplanned reasons stayed
about the same (8,000 MW).
"This is a really huge, huge improvement in managing the state's
reliability," said Cal-ISO spokesperson Stephanie McCorkle, adding
that for the past week DWR has been able to push more of its power
purchases out of the spot market, easing the planning pressure on
the grid operator.
Anticipating a bailout agreement, the state has moved to have J.
P. Morgan Chase & Co. underwrite what is shaping up as the
largest municipal bond sale in the nation's history --- about $10
billion to buy-out the transmission lines and fund improvements.
But lawsuits over non-payment to generators and the patience of
creditors were wearing thin last week. "As the (our) Feb 7 letter
(to Davis) says, we will not sign long-term deals until past dues
are taken care of and there is some resolution to the governor
"seizing" our PX contracts," said Duke's California spokesperson,
Tom Williams. "This state's behavior is similar to someone stealing
from a store --- the store owner is aware of it --- and then
wanting to open up a charge account. No business would ever operate
this way. Not in California, not anywhere."
While saying late last Friday that he thought the governor was
getting down "close to closing a deal," Jan Smutny-Jones, executive
director of California's independent power producers (IEP) said he
was getting concerned about time running out on the governor and
the state. There have been "a number of pushes and shoves going
different directions. A lot of statements made subject to no rate
increase; statements made with respect to no bailouts. And they
actually limit the ability of political leaders to maneuver. The
primary reason state ownership of the transmission grid is being
pushed is to provide a perception that in fact that the bonds
floated are for transmission assets not for paying for past
Last Wednesday the governor released a report identifying 32
potential sites for temporary electric generation peaking plants
that theoretically could be available to supply power during this
summer's expected severe peak-demand crunch, if a special 21-day
expedited processing scheme ordered under new state law by the
governor Tuesday has its intended results. The California Energy
Commission completed the report identifying the sites and said it
would administer the fast-track processing for the temporary
"I am determined to get as much power online as humanly possible
by this summer," said Davis in a prepared statement. "I commend the
energy commission for its swift action in developing this
report."ÿThe energy commission report identifies what are described
as "an initial round of sites that have a 95% or better probability
of being licensed under the state's emergency siting process." All
of the sites are large enough to accommodate plants of 50-MW or
larger in size.
The potential sites are all reportedly near transmission and
natural gas supply lines and in areas where there are available air
emission offset credits. The energy commission's next step will be
to work with local governments in the designated areas to make sure
there are "no overriding land-use restrictions that would prevent
the temporary power plant operations.
As of the end of last week, the California Department of Finance
estimated the state's power bill was about $1.7 billion since the
water resources department (DWR) began buying electricity for the
state's consumers in mid-January. This includes about $300 million
of real-time emergency purchases by the state-chartered grid
Richard Nemec, Los Angeles