Perhaps

Looking at Monday’s wild trading day in natural gas futures and perhaps taking a moment to regroup and contemplate their next moves, traders on Tuesday tested both resistance and support before pushing the April futures contract sideways.

Perhaps admitting to a little bit of overzealousness during Monday’s 16-cent rally, natural gas futures traders in overnight Access trading and then again on Tuesday pushed the February contract lower. With non-commercial traders continuing to hold a sizeable net-short position and some market watchers believing that the four-month-long downtrend is still intact, the question now becomes how much longer can the trend continue before it shows signs of cracking.

Citing Northeast market need and perhaps ignoring the track record of other recent projects in the area, TransCanada Corp. and Shell US Gas & Power LLC announced plans for a deepwater liquefied natural gas (LNG) import terminal about 11 miles off the coast of Connecticut and nine miles offshore Long Island in Long Island Sound.

Citing Northeast market need and perhaps ignoring the track record of other recent projects in the area, TransCanada Corp. and Shell US Gas & Power LLC announced plans for a deepwater liquefied natural gas (LNG) import terminal about 11 miles off the coast of Connecticut and nine miles offshore Long Island in Long Island Sound.

Citing Northeast market need and perhaps ignoring the track record of other recent projects in the area, TransCanada Corp. and Shell US Gas & Power LLC announced plans for a deepwater liquefied natural gas (LNG) import terminal about 11 miles off the coast of Connecticut and nine miles offshore Long Island in Long Island Sound.

Looking for an experienced global industry player and perhaps indicating a shift of potential gas supply sources, Houston-based Crystal Energy, LLC, announced last week that it has an “in-principle agreement” with Australian-based Woodside (USA) Energy Inc. to develop Crystal’s proposed liquefied natural gas (LNG) receiving terminal off the coast of Oxnard along the part of Southern California’s coast dotted with offshore oil platforms. Crystal originally proposed bringing Alaskan gas supplies through its terminal.

Looking for an experienced global industry player and perhaps indicating a shift of potential gas supply sources, Houston-based Crystal Energy, LLC, announced last week that it has an “in-principle agreement” with Australian-based Woodside (USA) Energy Inc. to develop Crystal’s proposed liquefied natural gas (LNG) receiving terminal off the coast of Oxnard along the part of Southern California’s coast dotted with offshore oil platforms. Crystal originally proposed bringing Alaskan gas supplies through its terminal.

Looking for an experienced global industry player and perhaps indicating a shift of potential gas supply sources, Houston-based Crystal Energy, LLC, announced last week that it has an “in-principle agreement” with Australian-based Woodside (USA) Energy Inc. to develop Crystal’s proposed liquefied natural gas (LNG) receiving terminal off the coast of Oxnard along the part of Southern California’s coast dotted with offshore oil platforms. Crystal originally proposed bringing Alaskan gas supplies through its terminal.

Perhaps offering a harbinger of some increased interest for natural gas exploration in California, a publicly held Los Angeles-based independent, Silver Star Energy, Inc., announced Tuesday it will drill a test well in part of the widespread, but mature, dry gas field in the Sacramento Valley of Northern California, between Stockton and Sacramento.