Developers

Land, Infrastructure in Place for Oregon LNG Project Developers

Although they are small operators compared to the principal project proponents dotting the liquefied natural gas (LNG) landscape, a quartet of privately financed veteran energy industry players indicated they have land and infrastructure interconnections well established for their run at siting a small LNG receiving terminal on the only harbor along Oregon’s rugged Pacific Coast.

December 20, 2004

Veteran Gas Project Developers Pushing Oregon LNG Project

A proposed liquefied natural gas (LNG) project emerging in its very early stages through the Oregon energy siting process is being backed by a private group of four natural gas industry veterans who expect to have a FERC application filed next year for a relatively small-scale $150 million receiving terminal and peaking generation plant at Coos Bay, OR.

December 13, 2004

Veteran Gas Project Developers Pushing Oregon LNG Project

A proposed liquefied natural gas (LNG) project emerging in its very early stages through the Oregon energy siting process is being backed by a private group of four natural gas industry veterans who expect to have a FERC application filed next year for a relatively small-scale $150 million receiving terminal and peaking generation plant at Coos Bay, OR.

December 13, 2004

Veteran Gas Project Developers Pushing Oregon LNG Project

A proposed liquefied natural gas (LNG) project emerging in its very early stages through the Oregon energy siting process is being backed by a private group of four natural gas industry veterans who expect to have a FERC application filed next year for a relatively small-scale $150 million receiving terminal and peaking generation plant at Coos Bay, OR.

December 13, 2004

Oilsands Developers Hit Hard by High Natural Gas Prices

Reliance on natural gas is a steadily escalating source of financial pain for oilsands complexes. Alberta’s three oilsands mining and bitumen upgrading complexes spent a total of C$692 million (US$520 million) on gas in 2003, or five times what they spent in 1999, according to the Calgary energy investment firm of Peters & Co. Ltd.

July 12, 2004

Shell Gets Mexican LNG Permit; Joins ‘Crowd’ in North Baja

Joining the increasing crowd of energy plant developers on North Baja beaches, Shell Mexico Tuesday announced that it received a permit from federal energy regulators in Mexico to build its proposed liquefied natural gas (LNG) receiving terminal in North Baja, joining Sempra Energy and Marathon affiliates that also have obtained approvals from the Comision Regulatodora de Energia (CRE).

August 20, 2003

NEB Ruling Stresses Pipeline Builders’ Accountability to Native Tribes

Natural gas producers and pipeline developers stand warned to make community relations a priority if they advance, as planned this year, a proposal to connect Arctic supplies with a project traversing the native-dominated Mackenzie Valley.

February 3, 2003

NEB Ruling Stresses Pipeline Builders’ Accountability to Native Tribes

Natural gas producers and pipeline developers stand warned to make community relations a priority if they advance, as planned this year, a proposal to connect Arctic supplies with a project traversing the native-dominated Mackenzie Valley.

February 3, 2003

Calpine Cites Disappearing Spark Spread in Lower Earnings Report

Calpine Corp., one of two West Coast merchant power plant developers to take it on the chin last Thursday, reported depressed second quarter financial results, mirroring unprecedented low wholesale electricity prices nationally in which the average spark spread between fuel prices and power prices are at historic lows below $5. Both PG&E Corp. (see separate story) and Calpine reported net income that was reduced for the quarter compared to the period a year earlier.

August 5, 2002

Greenbrier is First to Test FERC’s Pre-Filing Process for New Projects

Greenbrier Pipeline Co. LLC is touting itself as the first new project to use FERC’s new pre-filing process, in which project developers file a significant amount of information, including an environmental review and routing analysis, about a proposed project before the actual certificate filing makes it to FERC’s mailbox. Although Greenbrier, a mid-Atlantic project, won’t file its formal certificate application until later this year, the company has filed a significant amount of environmental information under the new pre-filing (PF) docket.

April 22, 2002