Determining

Top Trader Sees Potential for Higher Prices

Successful natural gas futures trading often depends on correctly determining what “story” the market is telling on a particular day, according to Sandy “Trot” Goldfarb, a 20-plus-year trading veteran. Speaking at NGI’s Natural Gas Futures Prices Workshop at the New York Mercantile Exchange last week, Trot said the plot of recent price movements indicates that there could be more room to the upside in this market.

October 10, 2006

NEB Forecasts Flat Production from WCSB Through 2005

Using current high natural gas drilling activity as a determining factor, Canada’s National Energy Board (NEB) projected in its latest Energy Market Assessment (EMA) that deliverability from the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) will be flat to slightly lower through 2005, with production maintained at the current level, which is about 16 Bcf/d (450 million cubic meters).

December 15, 2003

NEB Forecasts Flat Production from WCSB Through 2005

Using current high natural gas drilling activity as a determining factor, Canada’s National Energy Board (NEB) projected in its latest Energy Market Assessment (EMA) that deliverability from the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) will be flat to slightly lower through 2005, with production maintained at the current level, which is about 16 Bcf/d (450 million cubic meters).

December 9, 2003

Top E&P Stocks Show Stronger Than Average Operating Results

Reserve replacement and low finding and development costs are the key predictors in determining how an exploration and production company will do in the stock market these days, according to Southwest Securities.

November 10, 2003

Top E&P Stocks Show Stronger Than Average Operating Results

Reserve replacement and low finding and development costs are the key predictors in determining how an exploration and production company will do in the stock market these days, according to Southwest Securities.

November 4, 2003

Industry Briefs

The difficulty in determining savings from switching to another supplier can be the primary reason for not participating in customer choice programs. But a new handy calculator on the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel (OCC) web site (www.pickocc.org) makes the math easy for residential customers. The interactive calculator helps consumers compare rates of natural gas suppliers to their current natural gas company. Consumers enter the current rate of a natural gas supplier in the calculator, their county sales tax and their monthly natural gas usage to receive a side-by-side comparison of what their monthly natural gas bill would be if they chose a supplier versus staying with their gas utility. “Ohio consumers deserve easy to use resources to assist them in making educated utility choices,” said Robert S. Tongren, Consumers’ Counsel. “This new tool will aid consumers in calculating potential savings based on their natural gas usage and suppliers’ offers.” Three of Ohio’s natural gas utilities have offered natural gas choice programs since 1997: Cincinnati Gas & Electric, Columbia Gas of Ohio and Dominion East Ohio. About 38% of those companies’ eligible customers have participated by choosing an alternative gas supplier. Gas choice is being offered this winter for the first time for Dayton area customers of Vectren Energy Delivery of Ohio.

January 20, 2003

Ohio Consumer Advocate Does the Math for Making the Right Choice

The difficulty in determining savings from switching to another supplier can be the primary reason for not participating in customer choice programs. But a new handy calculator on the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel (OCC) web site (www.pickocc.org) makes the math easy for residential customers.

January 15, 2003

FTC Chair Outlines Merger Concerns

Federal Trade Commission Chairman Robert Pitofsky Thursdayoutlined some factors the FTC considers in determining whether andto what extent restructuring can save an otherwise anticompetitivemerger proposal. In remarks at the Cutting Edge AntitrustConference of Law Seminars International in New York City hestressed the need for transparency on behalf of federal regulatorsas restructuring proposals become more complex.

February 18, 2000

Rule Issued for Royalty Valuation on Indian Lands

The Interior Department’s Minerals Management Service (MMS) hasissued a final rule for determining royalties for natural gasproduced on Indian lands. Under the new rule, which was publishedin the Aug. 10 Federal Register, Indian leases would have theoption to either compute royalties on wellhead gas using apublished price index, continue using the existing gross-proceedsmethod for arms-length contracts, or use the current MMS benchmarksystem for non-arms-length sales. If gas is processed, Indiantribes then would adopt a “dual accounting” method under whichroyalties would be based on whichever has the greater value for gas- before processing or after processing. In most cases, it’s thelatter.

August 23, 1999

Rule Issued for Royalty Valuation on Indian Lands

The Interior Department’s Minerals Management Service (MMS) hasissued a final rule for determining royalties for natural gasproduced on Indian lands. Under the new rule, which was publishedin Tuesday’s Federal Register, Indian leases would have the optionto either direct producers to compute royalties on wellhead gasusing a published price index, continue using the existinggross-proceeds method for arms-length contracts, or use the currentMMS benchmark system for non-arms-length sales. If gas isprocessed, Indian tribes then could adopt a “dual accounting”method under which royalties would be based on whichever stage hasthe greater value for gas – before processing or after processing.In most cases, it’s the latter.

August 12, 1999
1 2 3 Next ›