Controversial

Four senators whose states have been proposed as sites for controversial liquefied natural gas (LNG) projects introduced legislation Monday to repeal a provision in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct) that gave FERC exclusive authority to site onshore LNG terminals.

A report by a task force created by Connecticut’s governor found that federal regulators’ environmental analysis of Broadwater Energy LLC’s controversial liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal and associated pipeline is seriously flawed, which it insists is enough to “torpedo” the facilities proposed for Long Island Sound.

A report by a task force created by Connecticut finds that federal regulators’ environmental analysis of Broadwater Energy LLC’s controversial liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal and associated pipeline is seriously flawed, which it insists is enough to “torpedo” the facilities proposed for Long Island Sound.

FERC could act on the application for AES Corp.’s controversial liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal project in Baltimore County, MD, by the end of the year, it said last Thursday.

FERC could act on the application for AES Corp.’s controversial liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal project in Baltimore County, MD, by the end of the year, it said Thursday.

FERC Friday issued a favorable final environmental review of Broadwater Energy LLC’s controversial liquefied natural gas (LNG) project and associated pipeline to be located in Long Island Sound.

FERC Friday issued a favorable final environmental review of Broadwater Energy LLC’s controversial liquefied natural gas (LNG) project and associated pipeline to be located in Long Island Sound.

A controversial energy policy reform bill — the Energy Policy Reform and Revitalization Act of 2007 (HR 2337), which would impose new restrictions on oil and natural gas producers and pipelines while repealing benefits that were offered to the energy industry in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct) — will result in new discretionary spending of $2.6 billion over the 2008-2012 period, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

A controversial energy policy reform bill — the Energy Policy Reform and Revitalization Act of 2007 (HR 2337), which would impose new restrictions on oil and natural gas producers and pipelines while repealing benefits that were offered to the energy industry in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct) — will result in new discretionary spending of $2.6 billion over the 2008-2012 period, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).