Sorting out a dispute between Dominion East Ohio and an ad hoc group of retail gas marketers in the state, the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) clarified its stance on a number of provisions in Dominion’s proposed tariffs in the state. PUCO sided with marketers on Dominion’s proposed operational flow order penalties, credit issues and upstream transportation requirements for retail service, but kept the bulk of Dominion’s tariff in tact.
Tinker
Articles from Tinker
State Regulators Tinker with Dominion East Ohio’s Retail Program
Sorting out a dispute between Dominion East Ohio and an ad hoc group of retail gas marketers in the state, the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) clarified its stance on a number of provisions in Dominion’s proposed tariffs in the state. PUCO sided with marketers on Dominion’s proposed operational flow order penalties, credit issues and upstream transportation requirements for retail service, but kept the bulk of Dominion’s tariff in tact.
May 29, 2003