The fallout from last year’s fatal San Bruno natural gas transmission pipeline rupture has spilled into Southern California where two 40-year-old butane storage tanks operated by a unit of a Houston-based company are stirring up local safety concerns. Three different risk scenarios completed in the past two years have stimulated debate.
Rupture
Articles from Rupture
PG&E Receives Final San Bruno Report, Faces More Fines
Federal regulators last Monday issued their final report and recommendations on the deadly Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (PG&E) natural gas transmission pipeline rupture and explosion in San Bruno, CA, a year ago. The 140-page document goes into more detail about what led up to the conclusions and recommendations released at the end of August (see NGI, Aug. 5).
NTSB Issues Final San Bruno Report; PG&E Makes Changes
Federal regulators Monday issued their final report and recommendations on the deadly Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (PG&E) natural gas transmission pipeline rupture and explosion in San Bruno, CA, a year ago. The 140-page document goes into more detail about what led up to the conclusions and recommendations released at the end of last month (see Daily GPI, Aug. 31).
Pipeline Rules Are a Focus in Many States; PG&E Pushes On
Eyes have been opened and ears perked throughout the West, if not most states, since the fatal San Bruno pipeline rupture a year ago and the serious flaws exposed in Pacific Gas and Electric Co.’s (PG&E) natural gas operations. California stakeholders and regulators in other states have taken action or are contemplating new measures aimed at ensuring gas pipeline safety in their states.
California Regulator Denies PG&E Pipe Re-Pressuring Plan
On the day before the one-year anniversary of the deadly San Bruno, CA, pipeline rupture and explosion last year, California regulators on Thursday denied Pacific Gas and Electric Co.’s (PG&E) request to have future increases in natural gas pipeline operating pressures done by a regulatory staff executive.
Two ‘Other’ California Pipe Operators Offer Contrast
A year after the fatal Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (PG&E) San Bruno, CA, pipeline rupture, California’s two other state-regulated pipe operators offer a marked contrast when it comes to safety practices. They vary greatly from each other as well as from PG&E.
NTSB: More Gas Pipeline Safety Regulation Needed
While there are multiple messages in the exhaustive report approved Tuesday on last year’s San Bruno, CA, natural gas pipeline rupture and explosion by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) (see Daily GPI, Aug. 31), there is one that rang out loudest from the five-member panel — tougher pipeline regulation is needed at both the state and federal levels.
Sempra Confident Pipelines Safe After Review, New CEO Says
In response to state and federal regulatory mandates tied to the natural gas pipeline rupture last year in San Bruno, CA, Sempra Energy’s California utilities have completed reviews and testing of their system in the southern half of the state, concluding that current operating pressures on pipes in highly populated areas are safe and appropriate, Sempra’s new CEO Debra Reed told financial analysts Tuesday during a second quarter earnings conference call.
Final NTSB Report on San Bruno Explosion Due in September
A final federal regulatory report including the identification of the cause of the San Bruno, CA, gas pipeline rupture and explosion last year will be completed next month, according to senior officials at PG&E Corp.
PG&E Pipeline Fallout Affects Credit Outlook
Nearly a year after the San Bruno, CA, natural gas pipeline rupture and explosion, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (PG&E) and its parent company face a negative credit outlook from Fitch Ratings, which nevertheless Tuesday affirmed the ratings of the utility and parent PG&E Corp.