Remands

FERC Splits the Baby — Transco Is Transmission, Jupiter Gathering

Acting on remands from two separate appellate courts, FERC last Thursday upheld a prior order declaring part of Transcontinental Gas Pipeline’s (Transco) pipeline network located onshore and offshore Louisiana to be transmission in nature and thus subject to agency jurisdiction, but it reversed itself on Jupiter Energy Corp. and found its small pipeline offshore Louisiana to be exempt gathering.

November 19, 2007

FERC Splits the Baby — Transco Is Transmission, Jupiter Gathering

Acting on remands from two separate appellate courts, FERC Thursday upheld a prior order declaring part of Transcontinental Gas Pipeline’s (Transco) pipeline network located onshore and offshore Louisiana to be transmission in nature and thus subject to agency jurisdiction, but it reversed itself on Jupiter Energy Corp. and found its small pipeline offshore Louisiana to be exempt gathering.

November 16, 2007

Appeals Court Remands Ad Valorem Tax Ruling, Cites Inconsistencies in FERC Decisions

A federal appeals court in Washington, DC, on Friday sent back to FERC for further explanation a case in which Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co. LP claimed that it was not responsible for payment of refunds for Kansas ad valorem taxes due to an indemnity clause in take-or-pay settlement agreements with Northern Natural Gas and Panhandle Eastern Pipeline.

January 24, 2005

Appeals Court Remands Ad Valorem Tax Ruling, Cites Inconsistencies in FERC Decisions

A federal appeals court in Washington, DC, on Friday sent back to FERC for further explanation a case in which Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co. LP claimed that it was not responsible for payment of refunds for Kansas ad valorem taxes due to an indemnity clause in take-or-pay settlement agreements with Northern Natural Gas and Panhandle Eastern Pipeline.

January 24, 2005

Appeals Court Remands ProLiance’s Market Power Case to Lower Court

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit told a lower court late last month to take another look at whether ProLiance Energy wields overwhelming market power in the Indiana gas market, a charge that was dismissed in 2000. ProLiance has been in and out of court over the past six years on similar charges.

December 8, 2003

Appeals Court Remands ProLiance’s Market Power Case to Lower Court

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit told a lower court last week to take another look at whether ProLiance Energy wields overwhelming market power in the Indiana gas market, a charge that was dismissed in 2000. ProLiance has been in and out of court over the past six years over similar charges.

December 2, 2003

Court Remands Decision on Transco’s FTW Rates

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia last weekreversed and remanded a FERC order rejecting Transcontinental GasPipe Line’s bid to levy two-part, “firm-to-the-wellhead” (FTW)rates on certain production-area customers served by the line.

March 27, 2000

Court Remands Decision on Transco’s Rates

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia last weekreversed and remanded a FERC order rejecting Transcontinental GasPipe Line Corp’s bid to levy two-part, “firm-to-the-wellhead” (FTW)rates on certain production-area customers served by the line.

March 27, 2000

Court Remands Panhandle Interconnect Ruling

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has remanded a PanhandleEastern Pipe Line decision that it says clearly departed fromFERC’s established policy on pipeline connections without providingany justification for the action.

December 6, 1999

Court Remands Panhandle Interconnect Ruling

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals last week remanded orders in aPanhandle Eastern Pipe Line case that it says marked a cleardeparture from FERC’s established policy on pipeline interconnectswithout providing any justification for the action.

December 3, 1999
‹ Previous 1 2