Questioned

FGT’s Tampa Contract Questioned

Florida Gas Transmission went too far in special rate treatmentand terms — not offered to other customers — to get TampaElectric on board for its Phase V expansion, according to FloridaPower. FGT’s current customers would unlawfully be required to bearextra costs and operate under less favorable conditions, FloridaPower told the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in its protestto FGT’s amendment to its expansion certificate (CP00-40-001).

September 6, 2000

Cross Bay Pipe Proposal Financing Questioned

New Jersey’s Public Service Electric and Gas Co. (PSE&G) hascalled on FERC to order the sponsors of the Cross Bay Pipelineproject to return to the drawing board and come up with anapplication that has a “more conventional structure,”

August 23, 2000

EnronOnline Strikes Again

Expanding its fast-growing sphere of influence within theindustry, EnronOnline, the Internet-based wholesale energytransaction platform sponsored by Enron, announced that it willhold the first online sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions allowanceauction in the U.S. from March 13-16.

March 13, 2000

Coastal’s Wisconsin Motives Questioned

Coastal says it has joined Peoples Energy to build a 130-milepipeline from Indiana to Wisconsin because the market needs thepipe. Others, especially backers of the proposed Guardian Pipeline,say the parent of ANR Pipeline is merely trying to protect its lockon the Wisconsin market.

December 13, 1999

‘Exclusivity’ of FERC Jurisdiction over Local Laterals Questioned

An Indiana case that confronts the issue of whether regulatingheretofore FERC-jurisdictional pipeline laterals should be sharedwith states has yielded somewhat conflicting decisions at theregulatory level so far. As a result, the potentiallyprecedent-setting issue seems destined for resolution by state andfederal appellate courts.

February 8, 1999
1 2 3 4 Next ›