Logical

Raymond James: Fuel Switching Needed to Balance Supply/Demand for Gas

More fuel switching is the only “logical, near-term solution” to balance supply and demand for natural gas going forward, according to latest Raymond James’ Energy “Stat of the Week.” Fuel switching has to occur, said analysts, to “squeeze out 5 Bcf/d of natural gas demand.”

March 4, 2003

Mackenzie Gas Project Takes Next Step, Hires Engineer

Taking the next logical step for the transportation of Canadian arctic natural gas, the Mackenzie Delta Producers Group, which consists of some of the heavy hitters within the oil and gas industry, said last Thursday that it has awarded the conceptual and preliminary engineering contract for the Mackenzie Gas Project to COLTKBR, a long-term joint venture of Colt Engineering Corp. and Kellogg Brown & Root, a subsidiary of Halliburton. The move brings the project a step closer to fruition and a step ahead of the competition in Alaska.

May 20, 2002

East Is Flat to Moderately Higher; Snowy West Softens

The market was back at it Friday, acting contrary to logical thinking in some traders’ minds. Eastern points were mostly flat overall, but ranging from mildly softer to more than a nickel higher at a few Northeast citygates despite weather in most areas that didn’t appear to justify relative firmness. Meanwhile, an honest to goodness winter storm was moving eastward into the Rockies, yet numbers were down by a nickel or more at most western points.

December 17, 2001

PSE&G Seeks End to State Regulation of Gas Prices

New Jersey’s largest publicly owned utility has asked stateregulators to take natural gas competition to its next logical stepby giving it the green light to begin selling gas to all customerclasses at market-based rates in 2003.

November 13, 2000

Futures Snap Back in Late-Day Rebound

“You can’t win the game if you give the ball away” was aseemingly logical but somewhat superfluous observation made byHoward Cosell on Monday Night Football back in the 1980s. If Cosellwere to have commented on the natural gas futures market yesterday,he probably would have said something like, “The market couldn’tmove lower because there was no additional selling.” And althoughthat comment would also have been redundant, it aptly describes thenature of yesterday’s price action at the New York MercantileExchange, where once early selling dried up, the market was free tobubble higher in near-frictionless trade. The May contract finishedup 3.2 cents to $2.128.

April 13, 1999
1 2 Next ›