Inappropriate

Within days of the disclosure of drug usage, inappropriate sexual activity and contract misconduct at the Interior Department’s Minerals Management Service (MMS), a former deputy associate Monday pleaded guilty to a felony violation of the restrictions on post-government employment that involved the illegal awarding of a contract to a company of a retired agency colleague (see Daily GPI, Sept. 11).

Stating that it was “inappropriate at this time to implement procedures that would unduly interfere with the normal operation of the natural gas market,” the National Energy Board (NEB) said late last week that it has denied the Province of New Brunswick’s application that would have put local interests first in line for offshore Nova Scotia supplies, potentially jeopardizing millions of dollars in investments for supply development and transportation. While it found no evidence of companies favoring U.S. export markets and discriminating against Canadian buyers, the NEB said it would organize a monitoring team and gather price and supply data.

Stating that it was “inappropriate at this time to implement procedures that would unduly interfere with the normal operation of the natural gas market,” the National Energy Board (NEB) said Thursday that it has denied the Province of New Brunswick’s application that would have put local interests first in line for offshore Nova Scotia supplies, potentially jeopardizing millions of dollars in investments for supply development and transportation. While it found no evidence of companies favoring U.S. export markets and discriminating against Canadian buyers, the NEB said it would organize a monitoring team and gather price and supply data.

Seeking to set aside what it called an “inappropriate” multi-billion verdict in which a jury awarded the State of Alabama $87 million in compensatory damages and $3.4 billion in punitive damages over unpaid royalty fees, ExxonMobil Corp. has filed an appeal with the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, AL. The case, decided last month, centered on charges that the energy giant (then Exxon, before its merger with Mobil) had underpaid up to $87.7 million in royalties on the Mobile Bay natural gas project in the Gulf of Mexico (see NGI, Dec. 25, 2000). The jury said it set the damages by tripling ExxonMobil’s annual production from 13 natural gas wells located on the Alabama coast in the disputed time. The long-standing contract dispute originally questioned whether an additional $40 million in royalties was due the state and exactly how the royalties should be calculated. To date, ExxonMobil said it has paid Alabama $1 billion in royalties and bonus payments under the lease agreement. “ExxonMobil believes that if this verdict goes unchallenged, other legitimate businesses in the state of Alabama – businesses that, like ExxonMobil, help expand the tax base, add to the economy and create new jobs – will also be potential targets,” the company said in a written statement. “Any company engaged in an open and reasonable contract dispute in the state will not be able to have reasonable disagreements with regulators without running the risk of being accused of fraud and being subjected to possible punitive damages.”

Seeking to set aside what it called an “inappropriate”multi-billion verdict in which a jury awarded the State of Alabama$87 million in compensatory damages and $3.4 billion in punitivedamages over unpaid royalty fees, ExxonMobil Corp. filed an appealyesterday with the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, AL.