The U.S. Bankruptcy Court in San Francisco extended the exclusivity period for PG&E’s plan of reorganization, but allowed regulators until Feb. 13 to provide the court with specific and credible evidence that they can produce a viable alternative. The court also ordered PG&E, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and the state to provide comments on Jan. 25 about whether a third party should be appointed to meet with them to try and attempt to resolve conflicts relating to PG&E’s plan.
Tag / Exclusivity
SubscribeExclusivity
Articles from Exclusivity
‘Exclusivity’ of FERC Jurisdiction over Local Laterals Questioned
An Indiana case that confronts the issue of whether regulatingheretofore FERC-jurisdictional pipeline laterals should be sharedwith states has yielded somewhat conflicting decisions at theregulatory level so far. As a result, the potentiallyprecedent-setting issue seems destined for resolution by state andfederal appellate courts.
February 8, 1999