Conservative

The Conservative government of Canada’s energy province is promising to inaugurate a new era of efficient regulation — by going back to the approach taken in its formative times. After 12 years of a forced marriage, Alberta’s natural gas, oil and power watchdogs will regain their former stature as two separate agencies responsible for supply development and protecting consumers.

While admitting its election came too late to ameliorate the Mackenzie Gas Project’s (MGP) regulatory ordeal, Canada’s nine-month-old Conservative government is vowing to make life easier for developments the northern pipeline is expected to inaugurate.

While admitting its election came too late to ameliorate the Mackenzie Gas Project’s (MGP) regulatory ordeal, Canada’s nine-month-old Conservative government is vowing to make life easier for developments the northern pipeline is expected to inaugurate.

The four-month-old Conservative government in Canada sees the long-awaited time for arctic gas to flow as arriving, according to Indian Affairs and Northern Development Minister Jim Prentice, a close associate of Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

The seemingly solid agreement among a mix of liberal/moderate Democrats and conservative/moderate Republicans on the newly configured five-member appointed California Public Utilities Commission last Thursday was jarred loose and split into a majority of market-based-solution advocates and a minority of command-and-control supporters over the creation of a telecommunications “Consumer Bill of Rights.” The measure was six years in the making and has gone through several iterations in the past 18 months.

A blunt greeting has been given to the newly-elected Conservative regime in Ottawa by a Northwest Territories government out to parlay northern gas development into a new economic deal for the Canadian Arctic.

Speaking to a group of conservative state legislators Wednesday, President Bush called the $14.5 billion comprehensive energy bill passed by Congress last week “a good piece of legislation.”

The use of so-called “conservative assumptions” in a study done for FERC on LNG tanker safety has resulted in “unrealistic potential consequences that may unduly alarm the public,” the Center for Liquefied Natural Gas (CLNG) said last week.

The use of so-called “conservative assumptions” in the study done for FERC on LNG tanker safety has resulted in “unrealistic potential consequences that may unduly alarm the public,” the Center for Liquefied Natural Gas (CLNG) said last week.