Address

Switching games? Or mind games? This past week, a Washington,D.C.-based nonprofit group, United Homeowners Association, called apress conference to charge that nationwide, utilities are playing”switching games” with consumers who attempt to move to alower-cost competitor, or who attempt to use online energycompanies.

Federal legislation is the only means to protect consumers forthe exercise of market power by dominant generators and utilitiesin competitive electricity markets, according to a U.S. Departmentof Energy report. The report says companies owning abundantgeneration in a local market may face few competitors afterrestructuring, allowing them to exercise market power and chargehigher prices.

FERC will address the remaining gas policy changes on its platebefore the end of the year, Chairman James J. Hoecker said lastweek, confirming what other commissioners have indicated recently.But some of the side dishes originally on the menu probably willnot show up at the table because most of the industry found themindigestible, Hoecker told attendees at the 55th annual meeting ofthe Interstate Natural Gas Association of America in Aventura, FL.A more market-oriented approach to regulation apparently is a tastethe industry and the Commission will have to acquire over time.

FERC will address the remaining gas policy changes on its platebefore the end of the year, Chairman James J. Hoecker saidyesterday, confirming what other commissioners have indicatedrecently. But some of the main dishes originally on the menuprobably will not show up at the table because most of the industryfound them indigestible, Hoecker told attendees at the 55th annualmeeting of the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America inAventura, FL.

FERC announced yesterday it wants to hold a half-day publicconference Sept. 29 to address the “steady flow” of Congressionalinquiries into the Independence and MarketLink pipeline projects.The conference will be used to gather “supplemental information” onthe projects, but the Commission said it does not intend to reopenthe record on them.

Faced with an onslaught of new pipeline projects, FERC this weekis expected to propose a policy statement that some say willestablish a “framework” to help the Commission select a winner whentwo or more projects are destined for the same market [PL99-3]. TheCommission has listed discussion of a policy statement on pipelineconstruction certificates on the agenda for its regular openmeeting Wednesday.

Faced with an onslaught of new pipeline projects, FERC this weekis expected to propose a policy statement that seeks to establish a”framework” by which it can pick the winner when two or moreprojects are destined for the same market [PL99-3]. The Commissionhas listed discussion of a policy statement on pipelineconstruction certificates on the docket for its regular openmeeting Wednesday. It will be FERC’s last meeting until September.

In a major clarification of policy, FERC decided it wasn’tnecessary to address the merits of each objection before approvingcontested pipeline rate settlements. Instead, it said settlementscould be ratified based on the reasonableness of the overallpackage. The policy adjustment was reflected in a rehearing orderthat approved a rate settlement between Trailblazer Pipeline andits customers as being “reasonable as a package” for consentingparties, yet at the same time severed contesting parties, AmocoProduction and Amoco Energy. The action cleared the way forconsenting parties to maintain the benefits of their settlementbargain while giving the Amoco affiliates a chance to litigate the”complex factual issues” that they raised [RP97-408-006].

A new bi-partisan bill was introduced Tuesday to address climatechange issues using “American ingenuity in the marketplace todevelop new technology that can be exported and deployed around theworld.” Chief sponsor, Chairman Frank H. Murkowski of the SenateEnergy Committee, said the Energy and Climate Policy Act of 1999would chart a different course than the Kyoto Protocol. “Our billrepresents a long-term, technology-based, alternative to Kyoto.Even if the U.S. succeeded in limiting its own emissions, “we areunlikely to compel China to submit to mandated emissions limits.But they want to buy our technology, so let’s play our stronghand.”