The National Center for Appropriate Technology (NCAT) is scheduled to release a new study Tuesday that documents the adverse impacts of electric and natural gas market restructuring on some residential consumers. The five-state study is the first product of an on-going project to examine the impacts of restructuring on residential consumers, particularly low- and moderate-income households.
“While these are early findings from a handful of restructured states, the study pinpoints those aspects of state’s programs that are detrimental to consumers, as well as those that serve consumers well,” said Kathleen Hadley, NCAT executive director. The study reviews Georgia’s restructuring of its natural gas market, as well as the restructuring of electricity markets in Massachusetts, Texas, Ohio, and part of New York.
“In the states that have relied on the pass-through of short-term market-based rates for default service, residential customers appear to be worse off compared to pre-restructuring rate policies, and are certainly worse off compared to customers in those states that have adopted rate caps and rate freezes that insulated customers from price volatility,” said consumer expert Barbara R. Alexander, one of the study’s authors.
At a minimum, the consumer experiences documented by the project suggest that legislators and regulators should develop policies that rely more on long-term stable rates and avoid short-term price volatility, she added.
The NCAT study also found that, with few exceptions, restructuring laws have not resulted in the lower prices or increased choices that many policymakers had anticipated. The exceptions occurred in selected regions in two states (Ohio and Massachusetts) that have utilized a strategy called opt-out aggregation, a low-cost way to pool the buying power of a large number of customers. The study found that this strategy has yielded significant electric bill savings for consumers and given them access to competitively-determined electricity prices and green power.
“The experiences in these two states are notable,” said study author Matthew H. Brown, “because they offer lessons about keeping electricity costs low while bringing the benefits of competition to residential and other small customers.”
Key highlights of the study include:
Â©Copyright 2002 Intelligence Press Inc. All rights reserved. The preceding news report may not be republished or redistributed, in whole or in part, in any form, without prior written consent of Intelligence Press, Inc.
© 2021 Natural Gas Intelligence. All rights reserved.
ISSN © 1532-1231 | ISSN © 2577-9877 |