Natural gas forward prices experienced yet another surge in the week before Hurricane Laura, a Category 4 storm packing 150 mph winds, made landfall, according to NGI’s Forward Look.
Double-digit gains were the norm outside of the Northeast and California, helped in part by surging global gas prices and a pullback in production ahead of the storm. However, with easing heat leading to steep declines on the coasts, September and October prices averaged only 4.0 cents higher for the Aug. 20-26 period, and smaller shifts were seen further out the forward curve.
Taking California and the Northeast out of the mix, the leg higher for U.S. forward markets mirrored the moves along the Nymex futures curve. On Wednesday, the September Nymex futures contract stood at $2.461, up about 11.0 cents from Aug. 20. October was up 7 cents on the week to $2.574, while the winter strip slipped a couple of notches to $3.08.
Most of the large price swings were concentrated at the front of the curve, where prices continued to gain in sympathy with Dutch Title Transfer Facility (TTF) prices as unplanned pipeline maintenance in Norway reduced exports to other parts of Europe. However, that work has now ended, exports have risen and weather outlooks are showing above-average temperatures continuing into November.
“Another mild winter would provide a considerable bearish influence for prices, particularly as European Union and Ukrainian gas storages trend at historic highs, even with the recent slowdown in injections,” said Schneider Electric commodity analyst Balint Balazs.
However, Laura was a more immediate concern for the U.S. LNG market. The storm took a direct hit on Sempra Energy’s Cameron LNG in the pre-dawn hours on Thursday. However, dangerous flooding and high winds meant that a full assessment of the damages is still days away, or longer.
Spokesperson Anya McInnis told NGI that Cameron LNG’s response team was on site throughout Friday assessing Laura’s impact on the plant. The work is ongoing and would continue over the next few days.
“Our focus is to secure the site, address any safety hazards and assess the integrity of the facility. When the assessment is complete, we can progress a timeline of activities to restart operations,” she said.
All Cameron employees are safe, and the company was working to provide recovery assistance for those impacted personally by the storm.
The Hackberry, LA, terminal shut down and evacuated all personnel ahead of Laura’s landfall. Sabine Pass LNG had done the same on Tuesday, and the eye of the storm ultimately missed the terminal by one mile. Sabine Pass had no updates Friday.
Analysts see LNG demand at Sabine Pass and Cameron taking about two weeks to recover, assuming no damage. Further demand increases are seen thereafter, with LNG seen “in the money everywhere by Sept. 15,” according to one participant on The Desk’s online energy platform Enelyst. “Prices get more and more bullish as you move out the curve.”
EBW Analytics Group said that by being on the ‘right’ (i.e., west) side of the storm, Sabine Pass was spared the worst impact. “The storm surge that developed was a few feet lower than expected, and the storm was far enough west of Henry Hub that it too was spared.”
The resumption of LNG exports could have a material impact on gas prices, according to EBW, with less at stake than perhaps the market assumes.
“If LNG terminals had been operating at capacity, even a few days of lost operation could result in a major loss of demand, and there would be no way to reschedule the lost cargoes,” said analysts. “At current capacity factors, though, the only question is timing. The vessels are sitting in the GOM waiting to be loaded.”
As soon as some trains can be restarted, gas would flow and the vessels loaded, according to EBW. Furthermore, Cheniere has the right to substitute cargoes from Corpus Christi “and has already started to do so.”
Bloomberg data showed seven vessels floating in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) Friday, with more headed toward the GOM.
Boom Or Bust
There are still quite a few other variables for the U.S. market to manage through ahead of the winter, most notably storage. On Thursday, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) reported a 45 Bcf injection into natural gas storage inventories for the week ending Aug. 21, lifting stocks to 3,420 Bcf. Although the build was below historical levels, inventories still sit 580 Bcf above year-ago levels and 438 Bcf above the five-year average.
Mobius Risk Group said the EIA’s 45 Bcf injection is tighter week/week on a weather-adjusted basis and “helpful for market bulls who understandably see the rally in downstream LNG demand markets and tightening domestic supply/demand later this year as reasons to add length.”
The next EIA report also appears to be generally supportive, according to Mobius, with early indications suggesting a build between 30 and 40 Bcf. This would compare to the same week last year at a 77 Bcf injection.
However, cooler weather is ahead, and there is risk of GOM production returning before LNG feed gas demand is able to ramp back, which are “notable short-term headwinds,” the firm said.
While acknowledging the bearish catalysts looming over the market, EBW said it is possible that significant floating LNG cargoes, which remain largely untested, may be underestimated by the market. August-to-date demand has exceeded expectations by roughly 1.0 Bcf/d, and staying ahead of expectations, including nearing full utilization by late October north of 10 Bcf/d, may remain on the table.
“Alternatively, the appearance of lasting production declines may convince the market that the winter strip remains undervalued,” EBW analysts said.
The EBW team is currently projecting 1.5 Bcf/d of dry gas production declines by the start of winter, which may cause the market to re-evaluate the current winter storage trajectory and push prices higher to ensure winter supply adequacy.
Longer term, analysts see significant price volatility remaining likely. EBW pointed out that the market typically balances through a combination of changes in the storage trajectory and changes in gas price that affect a “smaller, price-sensitive portion” of demand. With the market attempting to fill inventories to the brim without spilling over, however, reduced flexibility in the end-of-season storage figure may force increased price volatility to balance the market and keep inventories within the desired range.
In addition, fundamentals are enmeshed in significant uncertainty ranges, according to analysts, including LNG feed gas demand, coronavirus and economic demand impacts, production uncertainties and tropical storm impacts.
“Recent surprises have been mostly bullish, creating the dramatic rally in Nymex futures since early August, but bearish surprises could similarly yield outsized price declines in the months ahead,” EBW said. “While we maintain a bullish tilt on a seasonal basis, therefore, the risk of large price declines occurring at some point in the next 30-45 days should not be ruled out.”
With only brief periods of heat across the Northeast in August, and cooler weather ahead for the heavily populated region, forward prices tanked. The sharpest declines were at the front of the curve, however, and prices for the upcoming winter (November-March) slipped only slightly over the Aug. 20-26 period, according to Forward Look.
Transco Zone 6 NY September plunged 23.0 cents during that time to $1.136, while the balance of summer (September-October) tumbled 15.0 cents to $1.270. The winter strip fell only 2.0 cents to $4.940, and prices for next summer (April-October) were down only a penny to $2.410.
Similar pricing behavior was seen across the Northeast and upstream in Appalachia.
On the West Coast, some slightly cooler weather in California dragged forward prices lower for the week, Forward Look data showed. The SoCal Border Avg. September contract plummeted 30.0 cents from Aug. 20-26 to reach $2.848, while the balance of summer fell 10.0 cents to $2.710. Winter prices were down only 1.0 cent to $3.440, as were summer 2021 prices, which averaged $2.780.
© 2020 Natural Gas Intelligence. All rights reserved.
ISSN © 1532-1231 | ISSN © 2577-9877 |