The departure of Sen. James Jeffords from the Republican Party, declining natural gas prices and the absence of hot weather are beginning to ripple throughout the energy industry, with many of the leading energy stocks dipping lower last week and creating an “increasingly selective” investing environment, said Merrill Lynch analyst Donato J. Eassey Thursday.

The natural gas sector overall was down an average of 5.2% at the end of last week and is off 14.1% year-to-date, “primarily the result of the continuing rhetoric flowing out of California as well as the seasonal slackening demand for natural gas, resulting in lower commodity prices,” Eassey said.

However, Merrill Lynch maintains its stance that “nothing has changed with respect to fundamentals.” The investment firm expects earnings per share (EPS) growth this year, relative to last year, to average 24% for natural gas energy merchants. In 2002, the growth will be around 20%.

“These expectations are supported by our belief that the volatility in natural gas prices, and not the absolute price level, will continue to drive growth in these companies’ merchant operations north of 30% annually,” Eassey said.

Merrill Lynch’s Henry Hub price projection is $5.00/Mcf in 2001, “moving to $4.25 in ’02.” Eassey noted that this year’s estimate is below Nymex’s strip of $5.07/MMBtu.

In his Natural Gas Weekly Perspectives, Eassey noted that many of the leading energy merchant, independent power producer and utility stocks are coming under pressure because of the “political changes in Washington and the potential adverse implications for the Bush Energy Plan (including the possibility for price caps on power in the West).”

Also, the declining natural gas and power prices nationwide are driving down stocks because of “the absence of any sustained hot weather and concern regarding oversupply.” However, the analyst said that he believes the “ultimate outcome will have to be one that maintains reliability as well as be one that the markets (both industry and equity) can handle. At the end of the day, companies and investors need to see long-term incentives for investing in the infrastructure necessary to rebalance supply and demand.”

If caps are imposed in the West, “we believe that they would need to be set at a relatively high level in order to keep the lights on.” He noted that “most of California generators have locked a majority of their supply in long-term contracts with the state that would not be subject to caps.”

The Merrill Lynch analyst said he was less worried about the political problems and more worried about the markets, specifically the declining natural gas prices and the coming summer months. “While the early robust build in gas storage was not completely unexpected, given the significant deficit to last year and the expectation for price spikes during the summer’s peak, this has clearly led to an increase in weather-risk, with a normal summer now critical to maintaining price strength.”

Eassey said a cool summer would reduce earnings per share potential for the uncontracted portion of portfolios, and “could also hurt investor sentiment.” However, a hot summer where power prices remained at current levels would raise more near-term concern about “generation overbuild.”

Even with the current “concerns du jour,” Eassey noted that “it is the volatility in energy prices rather than the actual price” driving profitability in the energy sector. “Indeed, we believe many of these companies are taking full advantage of these downward price moves just as effectively as they did on the way up.”

Eassey noted that investors could take advantage of “price weakness” in the energy merchant sector, “building larger positions particularly in the lower price/earnings names,” including Williams Cos. and El Paso Corp.

©Copyright 2001 Intelligence Press Inc. All rights reserved. The preceding news report may not be republished or redistributed, in whole or in part, in any form, without prior written consent of Intelligence Press, Inc.