NGI Archives | NGI All News Access
Lawmaker Attacks Subsidies for Project to Promote LNG Shipments to West Coast
A $2 billion subsidy to help finance the construction of a new natural gas liquefaction facility and tankers to transport LNG to West Coast markets has been folded into a massive omnibus spending package that Congress is expected to act on next week, according to Rep. Edward Markey (D-MA).
Markey sent a letter to Republican Reps. Joe Barton of Texas and John Shimkus of Illinois Tuesday alerting them that the Alaska LNG subsidy, which he says was struck from the energy bill during conference, has resurfaced in the seven-bill appropriations package. Both Barton and Shimkus joined Markey and other Democrats in defeating the proposal, which had been offered by Rep. W.J. “Billy” Tauzin {R-LA) to subsidize facilities to transport LNG from Valdez, AK, to the West Coast, said a Markey spokesman. The proposal came as a “surprise” at the end of the final House-Senate conference session on the energy bill [HR 6].
As a result, “the energy bill, which [was] chock full of pork barrel subsidies…, didn’t include this egregious and unwarranted taxpayer giveaway,” said the Massachusetts lawmaker. But “this bad idea has now resurfaced as a rider to the final appropriations bill, ensuring that ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips and BP get the taxpayers to subsidize LNG facilities and tankers in Alaska.”
But Don Duncan, vice president for federal and international government affairs at ConocoPhillips, said Markey had his facts wrong. “We are not only not pushing this [LNG project], we are opposing this,” he noted, adding he had first heard about the $2 billion subsidy Tuesday.
Transporting LNG to the Lower 48 states “does not make much sense for Alaska; the economics are way off,” he told NGI. “If it were economic, we would have been pushing it [LNG] long ago” rather than focusing on the construction of a natural gas pipeline from the North Slope. “A $2 billion loan guarantee is not going to do much for a project like that,” Duncan said.
Markey, in a press statement, said the omnibus spending measure would authorize funds so that the broad energy bill, if it clears Congress, could provide $2 billion in federal loans for the construction and operation of the LNG facility in South Central Alaska. The energy bill is stranded in Congress, having passed the House only to be blocked in the Senate. The Senate has vowed to take up the measure again in January.
“In recent years, a number of existing LNG terminals have either been expanded or reopened to meet increasing demand, while numerous other liquefied natural gas terminals are currently being planned for construction at various sites around the country. At the same time, new LNG tankers are being ordered and built — all without the provision of any taxpayer-subsidized loan guarantees. I see no reason why the American taxpayer needs to subsidize this particular project,” Markey wrote in his letter to Barton and Shimkus.
The House is expected to vote on the multi-billion spending package that includes the LNG loan guarantee on Dec. 8. The Senate is scheduled to meet the following day, but it’s not clear if it will act on the appropriations bill then or wait until January.
©Copyright 2003 Intelligence Press Inc. All rights reserved. The preceding news report may not be republished or redistributed, in whole or in part, in any form, without prior written consent of Intelligence Press, Inc.
© 2024 Natural Gas Intelligence. All rights reserved.
ISSN © 1532-1231 | ISSN © 2577-9877 |