A recent legal settlement may have cast further uncertainty on a long-standing proposal for the Palomar natural gas pipeline to bring Rockies gas west of the Cascade Mountains into Pacific Northwest population centers.
Backers of the scaled-down 220-mile, 36-inch diameter line, say it is still alive but “on hold.” Without new commercial commitments for the pipeline, at least one of the backers said the project won’t go forward.
Revised “regional plans” for the pipeline are being worked out among its three main backers — TransCanada Corp., NW Natural and Williams’ Northwest Pipeline Co. — a Houston-based TransCanada spokesperson told NGI on Friday following a legal settlement among federal government agencies and environmental groups to rework proposed energy corridors for future gas and electric transmission lines in the West.
Opponents of the Palomar project who were parties in the settlement in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California have characterized the court action as the death knell for the pipeline project. But backers are not confirming that negative assessment, even though a filing to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) was withdrawn last year, and they admit that there is no target date for either a revised FERC filing or another open season to test market interest in a new gas supply line running along the Interstate Highway 5 (I-5)corridor through the Cascades to Northwest markets.
“We’re having discussions with Williams’ Northwest Pipeline for what we’re calling a regional approach,” the TransCanada spokesperson said. “We don’t have anything finalized, however, so the status of the pipeline is on hold while we explore options that might involve Northwest Pipeline, NW Natural and ourselves.”
The spokesperson said the most important factor at this point is that the major local gas distribution utility and the region’s two major interstate pipelines are cooperating to come up with a way to get more gas across the Cascades, into the Willamette valley and up the I-5 corridor. “What is going to drive that is commercial commitments, and we’re still in the process of trying to get those together,” said the spokesperson, adding that an open season is contemplated, but “way down the road.”
NW Natural CEO Gregg Kantor during a 1Q2012 earnings conference call earlier this year said that despite the FERC application being pulled the Palomar partners intend to file a revised application. “This year our goal is to continue to work with Northwest utilities to consolidate the effort to find a single, integrated solution around a shorter route…[see Daily GPI, Feb. 29],” he said. An open season is planned this year aimed at “identifying enough shipper support to proceed with the planning process,” according to Kantor.
Trouble for the Palomar project started last year with the termination of the Bradwood Landing liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal project, which was to connect with a western segment of Palomar. Nevertheless, Kantor said the eastern portion of the project “is more important than ever [see Daily GPI, March 1, 2011].” All interstate pipeline capacity serving the region west of the Cascade Mountains is fully contracted and at maximum use during peak loads, he said early last year.
©Copyright 2012Intelligence Press Inc. All rights reserved. The preceding news reportmay not be republished or redistributed, in whole or in part, in anyform, without prior written consent of Intelligence Press, Inc.
© 2020 Natural Gas Intelligence. All rights reserved.
ISSN © 1532-1231 | ISSN © 2577-9877 |