ExxonMobil Corp. last week launched a public relations campaign and Chevron Corp. is working with industry groups to assure the public that drilling unconventional wells using hydraulic fracturing (hydrofracking) is safe. The moves preceded separate annual meetings where shareholders voiced growing support for more disclosure about the well stimulation practices.

In the annual meeting in Dallas, ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson faced a barrage of shareholders who voiced their concerns about several issues, but mostly about hydrofracking.

A resolution calling for ExxonMobil’s board of directors to prepare a report on the “known and potential impacts of…fracturing operations” was defeated but still garnered support from more than 28% of those voting. A similar measure submitted for a vote at Chevron’s annual meeting in San Ramon, CA, also was defeated, but it received support from more than 40% of those voting.

The growing support by shareholders to require producers to disclose more information has not gone unnoticed, Tillerson said. Hydrofracking critics — and the media — simply do not understand, he asserted.

“The early detractors slap a label on something, and then it takes us a long time to get it peeled off,” Tillerson said. Gas drilling critics are “wrong” about hydrofracking. “It’s not new to us.” Drilling is a risky business, but if hydrofracking were to create environmental contamination, the companies would clean it up. “There are ways to deal with that.”

ExxonMobil “supports and agrees” that “we need to go out and get data” about the safety of hydrofracking. “We fully understand it and we have solutions to it. Once we understand and know what our contribution will be, we’ll act…We’ve taken an enormous position in the unconventional space, and it’s vital to our U.S. success. We’ve got to address it and we are confident it can be addressed.”

After conducting some public polling and finding that there are concerns about drilling’s environmental impacts, ExxonMobil has aggressively responded by buying advertisements to persuade critics that the industry is able to drill safely and will clean up any contamination that may result.

In addition to television advertising, ExxonMobil has run full-page advertising spreads in the New York Times and Washington Post, which both promoted the benefits of North American gas drilling. The ads depicted a typical unconventional gas well in the Marcellus Shale that included a detailed drawing of the shale well’s containment layers of steel and cement that are designed to prevent gas and fluids from migrating to soil and water from the pipe.

“We’re not trying to characterize [hydrofracking] as an activity that does not have risk,” Tillerson told the audience. “But we think there have been a lot of pretty casual statements about risks that are simply not backed up by facts.”

Tillerson also made a pitch in his remarks for hydrofracking to be regulated by the states, not federal officials. State-level regulators “manage the water…they understand better than anyone and can do better oversight. The same is true of point source air emissions in urban areas.”

In states where drilling is fairly new, additional regulatory oversight may be needed. “We are in discussions in Washington and elsewhere to bring state regulators together” to share their knowledge, Tillerson said.

ExxonMobil has nothing to lose and everything to gain in its hydrofrack persuasion campaign. After completing its tie-up with onshore shale giant XTO Energy Inc. last year the producer became North America’s top gas producer with shale gas, tight gas, coalbed methane, shale oil and conventional production in its portfolio (see NGI, June 28, 2010).

XTO, now an ExxonMobil subsidiary, brought with it massive leaseholds in the Barnett, Haynesville, Marcellus, Fayetteville and Woodford gas shales, the San Juan/Raton Basin, the Uinta Basin, East Texas Cotton Valley/Bossier Sands, the Permian Basin, the oily Bakken Shale and land along the Gulf Coast.

ExxonMobil at the time already controlled the largest leasehold in the Horn River Basin of British Columbia and was one of the biggest gas producers in Colorado’s Piceance Basin. In addition, the super major early last year acknowledged that it already was partnering with privately held Pennsylvania General Energy to explore nearly 300,000 net acres in Pennsylvania and New York’s Marcellus Shale (see NGI, Feb. 8, 2010).

Unconventionals in North America and around the world make up about 20% of the super major’s resource base. Including the XTO merger and “subsequent acquisitions,” Tillerson said ExxonMobil now has 100 Tcfe of unconventional gas and oil reserves. In the United States alone, the company estimates it has a well inventory of 50,000 in “multiple plays.”

“The XTO merger positioned us to pursue other unconventional resources,” both in North America and worldwide, with access to more than 10 million net acres — six million outside the United States, said the CEO. In the United States ExxonMobil is “positioned to double production over the next decade.”

He acknowledged that groundwater supplies have in the past been polluted by drilling for oil and gas, but he claimed that the likely cause was from wells that had not been “drilled as they should” in the 1920s, ’30s and ’40s. “More often than not,” he said, groundwater pollution cases aren’t “associated with any current-day activities.”

In his remarks to shareholders at the annual meeting, Chevron CEO John Watson didn’t mention the hydrofracking controversy, but he explained in some detail how the company uses the “safest, most environmentally friendly practices” across the board for exploration and development. Vice Chairman George Kirkland also reminded the audience that developing gas from shale rock formations costs less than other types of gas production, which offers advantages to the company and therefore its shareholders.

In an emailed statement a spokesman said Chevron also is working with industry groups also to educate the public about the chemicals it uses and procedures used to dispose of waste and wastewater.

Hydrofracking “can be done in a sustainable and environmentally friendly fashion,” but environmental standards need to be raised “across the industry,” said the spokesman.

Chevron also has a lot at stake in the hydrofrack controversy. Although its North American onshore holdings aren’t as extensive as ExxonMobil, Chevron claimed more than one million net acres in unconventional gas and oil leaseholds with the purchase of Atlas Energy Inc. late last year (see NGI, Nov. 15, 2010).

The Atlas deal handed Chevron close to 486,000 net acres in the Marcellus Shale alone. The super major also gained an estimated 623,000 acres in the Utica Shale, as well more than 370,000 acres in Michigan in the Antrim Shale (270,000 acres) and the Collingwood/Utica play (115,000 acres) (see NGI, May 10, 2010). The deal also included about 120,000 acres in the Chattanooga Shale and 123,000 acres in the New Albany Shale.

Chevron also obtained a joint venture (JV) partnership in the Marcellus play that was put together last year by Atlas with India’s Reliance Industries Ltd. (see NGI, April 26, 2010; April 12, 2010).Today most of Chevron’s shale development is focused in the Marcellus and Antrim shales (see NGI, May 9).

Information about Chevron’s drilling chemicals and other shale operations is expected to be released by the end of June through an organization called FracFocus, the company spokesman said.

The As You Sow Foundation — a nonprofit organization that backed the hydrofracking resolutions at the ExxonMobil and Chevron meetings — said that although the measures were defeated, the double-digit votes by shareholders indicate that “mainstream investors are concerned about fracking and want more disclosure.”

©Copyright 2011Intelligence Press Inc. All rights reserved. The preceding news reportmay not be republished or redistributed, in whole or in part, in anyform, without prior written consent of Intelligence Press, Inc.