Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal last Thursday called on the state’s regulators to impose significant penalties on Connecticut Natural Gas (CNG) for a rash of customer overbillings in January and February.
“I think that the overbilling…is astonishing and alarming,” and the East Hartford, CT-based local distribution company (LDC) broke state law when it sent out excessive bills in January and February to make up for apparent undercharges in November and December, he told the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control (DPUC) during an emergency technical meeting called to explore the overbilling issue.
The violation “very clearly implies the need for a penalty,” Blumenthal said. This “[would] send a message and establish a deterrent for this type of incident in the future.” The DPUC needs to investigate “who knew what when within the company,” and why the state agency wasn’t alerted earlier about the problem.
“I think what we have basically is a callous, cavalier disregard” for utility consumers, he noted. “We would submit to the DPUC that consumers should be forgiven for amounts above the previous year’s January bill.”
It was estimated that as many as 2,600-2,700 CNG gas customer were sent inflated bills in January and February to make up for billing errors in November and December. Some customers estimated the bills were $300-$500 above what they normally paid during those months. Most of the affected customers were residential users, but a few commercial and industrial users (71) received abnormal bills as well.
The DPUC last Wednesday threatened to fine CNG up to $26 million — $10,000 for each of the 2,600-2,700 overbillings.
CNG officials blamed the billing errors on a few renegade meter readers who submitted falsified and/or inaccurate reads. The LDC started to see a trend involving inaccurate reads by these meter readers in January, which triggered an internal investigation, said CNG President Robert Allessio. CNG, however, was sternly criticized for not notifying the DPUC about the problem until late January or early February. A CNG official said “we had no idea of the nature or magnitude” of the problem at the time.
When confronted by CNG, the three meter readers who submitted the false reads “denied what they were doing and appeared to be in cahoots,” said a CNG official. She noted that the company has since terminated them. In addition, CNG said it is considering bringing further action against them.
Even though CNG had concerns with the accuracy of its billing, it still required its gas customers to pay their January bills, explaining that the weather during the period was especially cold, Blumenthal said.
The DPUC ordered CNG to send out a letter by Feb. 15 informing affected customers that they would not be responsible for paying any additional charges until the DPUC has had a chance to fully investigate the matter. In the meantime, those that have already paid their January of February bills will be credited the amount in excess of that month’s actual usage, the agency said.
“Customers need to be assured that they will not suffer any financial penalties such as late charges nor will their service be terminated as a result of the company’s misrepresentation of their meter readings,” said DPUC Executive Director William Palomba. The next formal DPUC hearing on the matter in March 4.
“I am very disappointed with the company,” said Mary J. Healey of the Office of Consumer Counsel, adding that she wished CNG had come forward sooner about its billing concerns. “Our office will ask tough questions of the company,” she said.
“If the company has failed [its] customers, then sanctions should be levied,” Healey said. She further hopes the DPUC investigation will explore the “long-standing concerns over estimated billings…I would like to see a culture change [with] all utilities.”
CNG’s letter apologizing to its customers is a “good first step,” but she believes the utility needs to go even further.
©Copyright 2008Intelligence Press Inc. All rights reserved. The preceding news reportmay not be republished or redistributed, in whole or in part, in anyform, without prior written consent of Intelligence Press, Inc.
© 2020 Natural Gas Intelligence. All rights reserved.
ISSN © 2577-9877 | ISSN © 1532-1266 |