NGI The Weekly Gas Market Report / NGI All News Access

MMS: RIK Pilots Don't Violate Buy-Sell Ban

MMS: RIK Pilots Don't Violate Buy-Sell Ban

The Interior Department's Minerals Management Service contends a recent bid to exclude Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) pipelines from FERC's industry-wide ban on "buy-sell" transactions is based on the incorrect assumption that such transactions routinely occur as part of the agency's royalty in-kind (RIK) projects.

In a petition for a declaratory order filed in March, Williams Energy Marketing & Trading requested "guidance" from the full Commission on buy-sell deals particularly as they related to the Interior agency's RIK projects [GP00-1]. Specifically, Williams indicated it wanted a repeal of the buy-sell ban, which was instituted following Order 636, for offshore pipelines only, so that it could participate freely in MMS' RIK projects without fear of violating the Commission's prohibition.

According to Williams, the buy-sell issue arises when an RIK contractor buys gas from the MMS at one or more receipt points in the OCS, transports (as well as processes or separates) the gas on behalf of the MMS to onshore delivery points, and then sells the gas back to MMS once onshore. In exchange, the RIK contractor or contractors retain a portion of the gas, plus any processing revenues, it said.

"This is simply not the case. The MMS.....places no responsibility on the RIK contractor for any transportation, processing or separation. Once the contractor takes title to the gas at the wellhead, MMS has no interest in that gas whatsoever," MMS told FERC last week.

Because it has no transportation capability of its own in the OCS, MMS said it has devised an auction program to trade the gas it receives at the wellhead as royalty payment for gas at supply pools in a "number of possible locations" that are convenient to the ultimate consumer or consumers of the gas. In its largest RIK pilot to date, MMS noted the gas is destined for the Government Services Administration (GSA), which then will use it to meet the energy needs of several federal agencies. "The GSA takes title to [the gas at] these supply pools and then manages its distribution to the federal burner tip."

The entire transaction is "no more than a simple asset trade. The MMS assets in the Gulf of Mexico are traded for other [gas] assets. There is no mention of price, no mention of services that have to be provided, and no mention of any compensation."

Any decision on Williams' request "should depend solely on whether the Commission feels such a waiver has merit and allows [for] enforcement of the open-access and non-discriminatory transportation system envisioned by the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act," MMS said. "The MMS RIK program cannot and should not provide the basis for such a waiver."

In the event FERC should decide the MMS RIK program violates its "buy-sell" prohibition or "shipper-must-have-title" requirement, MMS asked that it be granted a specific waiver based on the "very tangible public interest in the program."

Producers and marketers made similar requests last month. They told FERC they could support a "narrow" exemption of the buy-sell ban for OCS pipelines, but they were ardently opposed to the blanket repeal advocated by Williams.

The Commission barred buy-sell arrangements because it said they provided pipeline customers an opportunity to circumvent the objectives of its capacity-release program established under Order 636, which requires open bidding by shippers. One example of a buy-sell transaction would be an LDC buying gas in the production area from an end-user or someone designated by the end-user, transporting the gas using its own firm capacity, and then selling it back to the end-user at the retail delivery point.

Susan Parker

©Copyright 2000 Intelligence Press, Inc. All rights reserved. The preceding news report may not be republished or redistributed in whole or in part without prior written consent of Intelligence Press, Inc.

Copyright ©2018 Natural Gas Intelligence - All Rights Reserved.
ISSN © 2577-9877 | ISSN © 1532-1266
Comments powered by Disqus