El Paso's Bondad Project Hangs in Limbo
FERC last week vacated its August order certificating El Paso
Natural Gas Co.'s planned expansion of its 33-mile Bondad system, a
move that the pipeline says puts the troubled project in an
"We don't know what we're going to do. We're looking at the
order and are considering" the various options, said Jerry Strange,
El Paso's director of transportation and marketing. He was unable
to say when the pipeline would decide the fate of the project.
The Commission said it based its action on Enron Capital &
Trade Corp.'s decision to terminate its service agreement for
100,000 Mcf/d of the expansion's capacity, which left the project
only 14% subscribed. Two other shipper-producers, Conoco Inc. and
Elm Ridge, remain committed to the project, Strange said.
"Enron's withdrawal...is a material change in the circumstances
relied on by the Commission in making its public convenience and
necessity determination" last August, the order said, adding that
the Bondad expansion as a result no longer meets FERC's
market-demand requirement (25% subscribed) for new projects. The
Commission, however, left open the possibility for El Paso to
re-file in the event it can re-market the Enron capacity.
The project called for the replacement of compression at El
Paso's Bondad station, upping the horsepower such that 116,000
Mcf/d of capacity would be added between its interconnect at San
Ignacio with Northwest Pipeline and Blanco in New Mexico.
FERC had further bad news last week for the future of the
project. Although vacating the certificate also mooted El Paso's
rehearing request, the Commission decided to offer its "guidance"
on the rehearing issues raised by the pipeline. It reasoned that
the outcome of the issues could affect "whether and under what
conditions" El Paso would re-file its application. El Paso struck
out on all counts.
The Commission reaffirmed its previous decision rejecting the
pipeline's request for incremental service for the Bondad project
shippers. Because the project would provide system-wide benefits,
the Commission continued to hold that El Paso's existing FT-1 rate
schedule was sufficient. El Paso's proposal for incremental service
"would create, without any justification, a preferred class of firm
shippers enjoying rate and capacity benefits...[that are] not
available to current firm shippers," the order said [CP98-149-001].
It also reaffirmed its decision to reject El Paso's
capacity-allocation plan that would, according to FERC, give Bondad
project customers "preferential access" to capacity through the use
of a separate service.
In a separate case, FERC gave El Paso the go-ahead to abandon
three segments, totaling 49 miles, of its El Paso-Douglas Line in
Dona Ana and Luna Counties, NM. "El Paso no longer needs Line 1005
for the operation of its interstate transmission system. Further,
our review of the record indicates that the proposed abandonment
will not adversely affect any of El Paso's customers," the
Commission order said [CP98-717].
©Copyright 1999 Intelligence Press, Inc. All rights
reserved. The preceding news report may not be republished or
redistributed in whole or in part without prior written consent of
Intelligence Press, Inc.