In the wake of a recent decision by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upholding Maryland's denial of a water quality certification for AES Sparrows Point liquefied natural gas (LNG) import terminal in Baltimore County, a company spokesman said it was considering several option, including petitioning for rehearing by the full court.
"The court's decision is a disappointment," but "we are continuing to move forward on our application before the Maryland Department of the Environment," said Kent Morton, project director.
In its decision last month, the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, VA, rejected AES Sparrows Point LNG's argument that Maryland waived its right to deny the water quality certification when it filed its denial out of time, and it determined that the agency's action was not arbitrary and capricious, according to Sutherland's LNGLawBlog.com.
"AES believes the Sparrows Point LNG project is good for the region...We continue to be encouraged by FERC's [the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's] decision...that reaffirmed the approval of the project, and we remain confident that we [will] obtain all of the necessary environmental permits and approvals," Morton said.
On Dec. 17 FERC upheld a prior order authorizing the AES Sparrows Point LNG import terminal in Baltimore County and the associated Mid-Atlantic LLC pipeline project (see NGI, Dec. 21, 2009).
The controversial LNG project has been the target of considerable fighting in and outside the courts, with the case going as far as the U.S. Supreme Court. In October 2008 the high court let stand a federal appeals court ruling that struck down a Baltimore County zoning ordinance banning construction of the terminal (see NGI, Oct. 13, 2008).
The state of Maryland in June 2008 suffered another major blow to its efforts to block the LNG project -- this time outside the court system. The Department of Commerce at the time overrode Maryland's objection to the proposed terminal and pipeline east of the Port of Baltimore (see NGI, June 30, 2008). Based on information submitted during the appeal, Commerce determined that the national interest served by the Baltimore facility outweighed its limited adverse coastal effects.
The Sparrows Point project, which was been the target of intense opposition by state and federal politicians, would have about 1.5 Bcf/d of regasification capacity with a potential for expansion to 2.25 Bcf/d. Regasified LNG would be delivered to regional markets via Mid-Atlantic Express, an 87-mile, 30-inch diameter pipeline that would extend from the terminal to connections with interstate pipelines at Eagle, PA.
The project, including three LNG storage tanks, would be located on 80 acres within the existing Sparrows Point Industrial complex.
Intelligence Press Inc. All rights reserved. The preceding news report
may not be republished or redistributed, in whole or in part, in any
form, without prior written consent of Intelligence Press, Inc.