NGI The Weekly Gas Market Report / NGI All News Access

Producer Hedging Usually OK with Standard & Poor's

While the U.S. oil and gas sector makes extensive use of derivatives to manage commodity price risk, and in some cases make a speculative buck, Standard & Poor's Ratings Services (S&P) said producer hedging practices have little impact on corporate credit ratings. This is mainly due to the fact that most companies hedge production only as far out as two years or so, and the ratings agency takes a longer-term view when assessing credit.

Still, S&P credit analysts found producer hedging to be of enough significance to pen a research note of eight pages, plus tables. Among the 140-odd oil and gas companies rated by S&P, those most likely to eschew hedging and ride the market are the big producers, and otherwise, their commodity hedges generally aren't material to corporate results, S&P said.

Companies with lower credit ratings, independents, are far more likely to hedge commodity risk, S&P said, but this has little overall impact on how the agency rates them.

"While perhaps counterintuitive, the degree to which a company hedges does not materially affect its corporate credit rating in most cases. Corporate credit ratings reflect a company's long-term ability to meet debt service requirements. In most cases, hedges only cover one to two years of anticipated production, and therefore do not mitigate cash flow volatility risks over the longer term."

Still, hedging can help companies with speculative ratings in two ways. For one, S&P said it can more confidently predict near-term cash flows when a significant portion of anticipated production is hedged. Second, a consistent hedging policy may reflect a more conservative financial policy.

"However, surprisingly few companies, in our opinion, have demonstrated a consistent policy of hedging commodity price risk through the cycle," S&P said. "Merely having hedges in place does not necessarily indicate a conservative financial policy. Some companies attempt to time the market and will actively enter and exit hedges to try to maximize shareholder value.

"From a rating perspective, trading for profit could indicate that management has a tolerance for higher risk."

When hedges are out of the money they can put a damper on a company's upside potential. However, S&P evaluates this circumstance in terms of its impact on credit quality on a case by case basis, and the firm takes a relatively sanguine view of underwater hedges. "We rate to relatively conservative price assumptions and much of the hedging losses would dissipate in a lower price environment."

S&P writes that the need to post collateral is generally more significant for diversified companies, such as Questar Corp. and Dominion Resources Inc. Both are utilities with oil and gas producing operations and both have investment-grade ratings. And both have posted collateral for out-of-the-money hedges.

Some companies have been able to avoid additional collateral requirements when their hedges go the wrong way. For example, Chesapeake Energy Corp., the largest speculative-grade company rated by S&P in the sector, is an active hedger. Because it hedges with banks that are members of its syndicated credit facility it can often avoid posting collateral. "These banks may consider hedging arrangements more broadly as part of their overall exposure to an issuer and, consequently, do not require cash collateral," S&P writes.

Additionally, in Chesapeake's case, the company often hedges with other large financial institutions on a bilateral basis. "These institutions can demand cash collateral, but Chesapeake has negotiated caps to mitigate the potential liquidity impact," according to S&P.

According to a recent investor presentation, Chesapeake's oil and gas production is substantially hedged. On the gas side, 88% is hedged for the second through fourth quarters of this year. The company's gas is 69% hedged for 2007 and 55% hedged for 2008. Prices are $9.08, $9.86 and $9.34, respectively. Oil production is hedged 79%, 56% and 48% for the same periods, respectively, at $63.24, $68.79 and $69.50, respectively.

Also in its note last week, S&P provided its commodity price assumptions as of May 9. Henry Hub natural gas is pegged at $7.00/MMBtu, $5.50/MMBtu, and $4.50/MMBtu in 2006, 2007, 2008, respectively. WTI crude is pegged at $60.00/bbl, $50.00/bbl, and $40.00/bbl in 2006, 2007, 2008.

©Copyright 2006 Intelligence Press Inc. All rights reserved. The preceding news report may not be republished or redistributed, in whole or in part, in any form, without prior written consent of Intelligence Press, Inc.

ISSN © 2577-9877 | ISSN © 1532-1266
Comments powered by Disqus