El Paso's Partial Capacity Segmentation Plan Under Fire
A capacity segmentation tariff filing by El Paso Natural Gas is
"yet one more stonewalling attempt on El Paso's part to avoid
compliance with [FERC] rules and regulations," Indicated Shippers
told the Commission last week.
El Paso's proposal has come under heavy fire from producers and
marketers. Municipal shippers, however, like the plan, which
declares that full segmentation is not operationally feasible
because El Paso's system is not pathed and capacity is allocated on
a pro rata basis.
The proposal would limit capacity segmentation on El Paso's
system to three proposed routes: San Juan to Topock, Permian to
Ehrenberg and Anadarko to Plains (Docket RP00-336-001). El Paso
made the filing on Aug. 15 in compliance with Commission Order 637,
which required all pipelines to allow shippers to segment their
firm capacity into separate parts for use or release to other
shippers to the extent it was operationally feasible.
Several months ago, El Paso filed for and received a deferral
from FERC for the segmentation filing to allow time for a
settlement in an ongoing complaint proceeding regarding the
pipeline's capacity allocation methods (Docket RP99-507). A
settlement, however, has not been reached, and shippers, including
Dynegy, BP Energy, Burlington, Conoco and others, say the pipeline
has been "unwilling to completely path its system and has no
incentive to do so unless ordered by the Commission because it is
able to game the system today by enabling it to oversell firm
"The fundamental issue in this [capacity segmentation] case (and
the related complaint case)," said Indicated Shippers, "is that El
Paso is attempting to retain for its own use all system flexibility
in order to permit it to maximize revenues by selling more capacity
that it has available on a pathed basis, rather than providing its
firm shippers with flexible rights to use the firm capacity for
which they have paid."
Sempra Energy told FERC the proposal is "too little, too late.
It will not work in the competitive environment envisioned in and
promoted by Orders Nos. 637, et al. Accordingly the Commission must
direct El Paso to develop procedures expeditiously that will result
in full pathing and full segmentation opportunities for its
shippers at the earliest possible date." Sempra requests a
technical conference be convened on the issue.
In contrast, municipal shippers told the Commission they agree
with El Paso that FERC should not "force a cookie cutter policy" on
El Paso's unique system. "The last thing El Paso should be trying
to do today is reduce the ability of its shippers to access gas in
the San Juan basin, which would be the result of full
segmentation... This summer, gas sourced from the San Juan basin
has cost more than a full dollar less than gas sourced at the
alternative Permian basin. That gas price differential is many
multiples of any potential value of segmented capacity..... Thus
full segmentation and full pathing of the system is not in the
public interest," the El Paso Municipal Customer Group said.
©Copyright 2000 Intelligence Press, Inc. All rights
reserved. The preceding news report may not be republished or
redistributed in whole or in part without prior written consent of
Intelligence Press, Inc.