AGLS Appeals Brand-Name Ruling
Atlanta Gas Light Services has vowed to fight a decision by a
Georgia Public Service Commission hearing officer that would
prohibit the company from using the name of its utility affiliate,
Atlanta Gas Light. The marketing affiliate filed an appeal June 26,
contending the initial decision, if upheld, would "reduce
competition in direct violation of the statutory purposes of the
[Georgia] Natural Gas Act" when the deregulated market opens this
AGL said the decision was an "unprecedented, over-broad and
punitive restriction on free speech. Requiring Atlanta Gas Light
Services to use a pseudonym and to conceal its true identity will
also deprive Georgia consumers of truthful information that will
enable them to make a reasoned choice of a natural gas supplier,"
the AGLS appeal states.
The company supported its position with the conclusions of an
economics professor at the Institute for Mathematical Behavioral
Sciences at the University of California-Irvine. Arthur De Vany,
who is co-author of The Emerging New Order in Natural Gas: Markets
vs. Regulation and has prepared written testimony on competition in
natural gas markets for FERC, said he sees "absolutely no reason
whatsoever for an affiliate marketer not to use the parent's name.
To do so, he added, "actually denies consumers of the right to
information they might want to use."
The hearing officer's ruling concluded, however, that the
marketing affiliate should "rely on the reputation it builds as a
separate entity and its own business acumen to secure customers in
Georgia, just as all other marketers."
©Copyright 1998 Intelligence Press, Inc. All rights
reserved. The preceding news report may not be republished or
redistributed in whole or in part without prior written consent of
Intelligence Press, Inc.