NGI The Weekly Gas Market Report
NGI The Weekly Gas Market Report | NGI All News Access
CPUC Nixes Anti-competitive Deal With Municipal
The California Public Utilities Commission has squashed a dealbetween Pacific Gas and Electric and a north-central valleymunicipal utility for being anticompetitive. A PG&E spokespersonsaid the large utility was both “surprised and disappointed” by the3-2 negative vote, indicating his company would resume negotiationsto work out a deal acceptable to the state regulators.
The PG&E utility had agreed to sell Modesto IrrigationDistrict (MID) part of its electric distribution system serving23,000 customers in four rural towns in Modesto County for $89.8million, but the CPUC reacted negatively to three portions of theaccompanying service area agreement that include a 25-year”no-compete” clause.
The three aspects in the deal that drew CPUC criticism are:
PG&E utility customers outside of MID’s expanded territorywould have no chance to benefit from electric distributioncompetition for at least five years because of the MID agreement.
PG&E utility customers who would become MID customers couldno longer choose between MID and PG&E for electric distributionservice. The same customers would have to wait until as late as2002 to have their choice of power providers because MID, as agovernment-run utility, is not required by California’s electricrestructuring law to provide its customers with direct access ifthey want it.
Another part of the agreement would have required MID to payPG&E an additional $54 million to cover the competitiontransition charges (CTC) the investor-owned utility would haverecovered from the customers switching to the government utility.Also, up to half the savings PG&E realized from the deal wouldhave to be refunded to its utility customers. However, the CPUC didnot rule on these parts of the deal because of the rejection basedon its anti-competitive aspects.
In recent years, MID has competed aggressively with PG&E forcustomers as one of the state’s larger government-run electricoperations. PG&E earlier sought state legislation and civilcourt actions to bar MID’s efforts before the two utilities in 1996began negotiating a settlement.
As a special district, MID holds a different status thanmunicipal utilities run by charter cities. It has powers ofcondemnation and authority to acquire and operate electric plantsas well as sell power to cities, public utility districts andindividuals. MID currently serves 90,000 customers in centralCalifornia. Richard Nemec, Los Angeles
©Copyright 1998 Intelligence Press, Inc. All rightsreserved. The preceding news report may not be republished orredistributed in whole or in part without prior written consent ofIntelligence Press, Inc.
© 2024 Natural Gas Intelligence. All rights reserved.
ISSN © 2577-9877 | ISSN © 1532-1266 |