Daily GPI / NGI All News Access

Amoco Backs Auction for Short-, Long-Term Markets

Amoco Backs Auction for Short-, Long-Term Markets

In a lengthy filing at FERC earlier this week, Amoco Production and Amoco Energy Trading registered their strong support for the controversial auction of capacity in both the short-term and long-term transportation markets.

"Capacity auctions are nothing new, despite much rhetoric suggesting the contrary...The Commission will undoubtedly be assaulted with comments opposing a capacity auction, especially a truly market-based auction with no reserve price for next-day capacity. But the Commission should not be dissuaded by these claims," the Amoco companies said in their comments on the notice of proposed rulemaking focusing on the short-term transportation market [RM98-10].

Specifically, Amoco asked that the auction: be standardized across all pipelines; exempt prearranged deals of less than one month unless they involve a pipeline and its affiliate; allow pipelines to set a reserve price for periods of greater than a day, but not in the daily market; require pipes to offer and post all available pipeline capacity; implement closed bidding, with the winning bidder paying the actual price bid rather than the "market clearing" price; and require all transactions to be immediately posted.

On a related initiative, Amoco recommended that removal of the price caps in the short-term market be limited to only transactions involving a term of less than one month (intra-month market) and be subject to mandatory conditions, including the capacity auction. The NOPR, in contrast, seeks to have the price-cap removal apply to longer term deals-less than one year.

For the purposes of their proposal, the companies suggested that the duration of the short-term market be narrowed to less than one month (the intra-month market), as opposed to less than one year. They also proposed that the long-term market be redefined as one month or more, rather than a year or more. The new definitions would more properly reflect the "transactional realities of today's gas markets."

Amoco contends few shipper benefits would be realized by removing price cap in the FERC-endorsed intra-year market, which it claims is highly concentrated and not competitive. It believes the intra-month to intra-day operational markets are preferable. These "are generally the most liquid markets with capacity more readily tradable than in longer term markets. There are more active participants in the intra-month market and, in fact, the vast majority of capacity-release transactions are for periods of one month or less."

In addition to redefining short term, the Amoco companies said other conditions would have to be met for them to support lifting the price cap; the Commission would have to implement capacity auctioning; instill effective monitoring and reporting requirements; require cost-based and seasonally adjusted transportation rates in the longer term market; require the competitive auctioning of long-term capacity to ensure the viability of recourse service; bar discount adjustments unless capacity auctioning is in place; and to maintain the existing market-power test in the alternative ratemaking policy statement.

Of all the initiatives in the NOPR, Amoco said it was most concerned about the proposal that would permit pipelines to negotiate terms and conditions of services with customers. "In Amoco's view, this issue is not, as pipelines claim, about providing flexible or innovative services to customers who desire them. It is instead about reversing an ongoing pro-competitive evolution...[towards] the commoditization of short-term pipeline capacity." Amoco and others especially question whether recourse rates will be sufficient to protect captive customers from any competitive advantage caused by negotiated services.

At the very most, any authority for pipelines to negotiate terms and conditions should be "limited and conditioned," Amoco told the Commission. Specifically, FERC should permit "financial risk" management services to be negotiated, but limit the negotiation of "operational" services; require that negotiable "operational" services be primary-point specific and associated with specified facilities; require the terms of an affiliate contract to be made available to all shippers; bar negotiated services for contracts with a term of less than one year; subject negotiated contracts to general system rate increases; hold pipelines "at-risk" for revenues associated with negotiated services; and prohibit the tying of negotiated services.

©Copyright 1999 Intelligence Press Inc. All rights reserved. The preceding news report may not be republished or redistributed, in whole or in part, in any form, without prior written consent of Intelligence Press, Inc.

Comments powered by Disqus